H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nathalie Dechy vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 1-3

Chanda Rubin holds a 3–1 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Chanda Rubin leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2000 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2000* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Nathalie Dechy #24 6-3 6-1 Chanda Rubin #18 Match data
Oct 14, 1999* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #25 7-5 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #28 Match data
Aug 19, 1999* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R32 Hard Chanda Rubin #23 6-2 4-6 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #27 Match data
Oct 31, 1998* Quebec City WTA 250 SF Carpet Chanda Rubin #38 6-2 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Dechy Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7