H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 2-2
Nathalie Dechy and Conchita Martínez are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Conchita Martínez won the 2005 Dubai fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2005* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-1 6-2 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2004* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 6-4 6-4 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Mar 2, 2000* | Scottsdale | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Conchita Martínez | Match data |
| Jan 8, 2000* | Gold Coast | WTA 500 | SF | Hard | Conchita Martínez | 6-3 6-1 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Conchita Martínez | #1,498 | #2 | 3,180 | 2,263 | 669 | 275 | 70.9% | 1 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Conchita Martínez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–6 | 70.0% | #41 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 35–9 | 79.5% | #7 | 1,933 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–10 | 79.2% | #11 | 2,063 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #9 | 2,076 | 0 | 10 |
| 20 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #8 | 2,054 | 0 | 11 |
| 21 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 66–13 | 83.5% | #4 | 2,158 | 0 | 16 |
| 22 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 51–14 | 78.5% | #3 | 2,065 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 57–10 | 85.1% | #2 | 2,182 | 1 | 26 |
| 24 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #4 | 2,074 | 1 | 28 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #12 | 2,011 | 1 | 28 |
| 26 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #8 | 1,968 | 1 | 30 |
| 27 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #15 | 1,898 | 1 | 31 |
| 28 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #5 | 1,951 | 1 | 32 |
| 29 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #35 | 1,852 | 1 | 32 |
| 30 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #34 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #18 | 1,756 | 1 | 32 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #42 | 1,772 | 1 | 32 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #31 | 1,812 | 1 | 33 |