H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Fang Li H2H: 1-1
Nathalie Dechy and Fang Li are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on grass, while Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fang Li won the 1998 Stanford third round 4-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1998* | Stanford | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Fang Li | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1998* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Nathalie Dechy | 6-4 6-4 | Fang Li | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nathalie Dechy | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |