H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Karina Habsudova H2H: 2-2
Nathalie Dechy and Karina Habsudova are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2000 Miami second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2000* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 6-1 6-1 | Karina Habsudova | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2000* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Nathalie Dechy | 6-3 6-4 | Karina Habsudova | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1997* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Karina Habsudova | 2-6 6-4 6-3 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1996* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Karina Habsudova | 6-4 6-2 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Karina Habsudova | #792 | #10 | 2,022 | 1,953 | 168 | 172 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Karina Habsudova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #124 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #54 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #66 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #113 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #85 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #123 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |