H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nathalie Dechy vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 2-2

Nathalie Dechy and Lilia Osterloh are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Lilia Osterloh won the 2002 Canberra quarterfinal 4-6 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 11, 2002* Canberra WTA 250 QF Hard Lilia Osterloh #53 4-6 7-5 6-3 Nathalie Dechy #42 Match data
Mar 23, 2001* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lilia Osterloh #52 6-2 7-6(5) Nathalie Dechy #36 Match data
Mar 10, 2001* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nathalie Dechy #36 6-1 6-1 Lilia Osterloh #51 Match data
Oct 22, 1999* Bratislava WTA 250 R16 Hard Nathalie Dechy #28 6-0 6-2 Lilia Osterloh #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,697 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Dechy Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,551 0 0
20 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,595 0 0
23 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,659 0 0
24 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,509 0 0
26 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,543 0 0
30 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0