H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-0
Nathalie Dechy holds a 1–0 lead over Lori Mcneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 1996 Paris third round 6-3 4-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 1996* | Paris | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Nathalie Dechy | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Lori Mcneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Lori Mcneil | #867 | #9 | 303 | 2,032 | 377 | 273 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Lori Mcneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 13–23 | 36.1% | #93 | 1,587 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 54–24 | 69.2% | #11 | 2,017 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #13 | 1,904 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,760 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #52 | 1,696 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,870 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 37–20 | 64.9% | #15 | 1,962 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #17 | 1,871 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #34 | 1,804 | 0 | 11 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #83 | 1,726 | 0 | 11 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #301 | 1,655 | 0 | 11 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #91 | 1,717 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #869 | 1,669 | 0 | 11 |