H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Nathalie Dechy vs Mary Pierce H2H: 0-4

Mary Pierce holds a 4–0 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mary Pierce leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mary Pierce won the 2005 San Diego fourth round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Mary Pierce
FRA Age 51 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 5, 2005* San Diego WTA 1000 R16 Hard Mary Pierce #14 7-5 6-3 Nathalie Dechy #15 Match data
Mar 4, 2000* Scottsdale WTA 500 QF Hard Mary Pierce #6 6-3 6-2 Nathalie Dechy #26 Match data
Apr 9, 1999* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Mary Pierce #8 2-6 6-4 6-3 Nathalie Dechy #29 Match data
Jan 8, 1999* Hope Island WTA 250 QF Hard Mary Pierce #7 6-4 6-3 Nathalie Dechy #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mary Pierce #560 #3 3,797 2,137 460 215 68.1% 2 5 0 3 8 18

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Dechy Mary Pierce
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 0–3 0.0% #243 1,480 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 6–7 46.2% #107 1,543 0 0
16 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0 1991 21–9 70.0% #26 1,786 0 1
17 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0 1992 31–9 77.5% #13 1,901 0 4
18 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0 1993 38–15 71.7% #12 2,003 0 5
19 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0 1994 43–16 72.9% #5 2,053 0 5
20 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0 1995 35–14 71.4% #5 2,008 1 7
21 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0 1996 17–11 60.7% #24 1,899 1 7
22 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0 1997 45–15 75.0% #7 2,053 1 8
23 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0 1998 35–12 74.5% #7 2,120 1 12
24 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1 1999 45–19 70.3% #5 2,053 1 13
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1 2000 29–11 72.5% #7 2,033 2 15
26 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1 2001 6–8 42.9% #129 1,839 2 15
27 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1 2002 14–13 51.9% #52 1,752 2 15
28 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1 2003 23–17 57.5% #33 1,786 2 15
29 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1 2004 22–16 57.9% #29 1,754 2 16
30 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1 2005 41–12 77.4% #5 2,119 2 18
31 — — — — — — — 2006 9–8 52.9% #79 1,967 2 18