H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-2
Monica Seles holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Dechy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2003 Amelia Island fourth round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2003* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Monica Seles | 6-1 6-2 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2000* | Oklahoma | WTA 500 | F | Carpet | Monica Seles | 6-1 7-6(3) | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 |
| 17 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 |
| 18 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 |
| 19 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 |
| 20 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 |
| 22 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 |
| 23 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 |
| 24 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 |
| 26 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 |
| 27 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 |
| 28 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 |
| 29 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 |
| 30 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |