H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Nathalie Dechy holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Kolbovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2001 Quebec City round of 32 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | 6-1 6-2 | Renata Kolbovic | Match data | Sep 20, 2001* | R32 | Quebec City | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,918 | 293 | 272 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Renata Kolbovic | #653 | #159 | 179 | 1,508 | 2 | 6 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Renata Kolbovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,788 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #159 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Renata Kolbovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2000 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1999 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2002 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 24 | 2003 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2001 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2004 | 28 | 16 | 44 | 63.6% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2005 | 28 | 17 | 45 | 62.2% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 34.8% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 160 | 145 | 305 | 52.5% | 71 | 66 | 137 | 51.8% | 34 | 33 | 67 | 50.7% | 28 | 28 | 56 | 50.0% | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Renata Kolbovic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1481 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 1501 | 112.9 | — | — | — | — | +19 | +53 | — | 38.5% | -0.79 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–0 | — | +0.56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 1540 | 124.8 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +9 | — | 42.9% | -0.29 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–1 | — | -0.35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 1607 | 125.9 | — | — | — | — | -40 | -52 | +18 | 42.2% | -0.42 | 3–5 (38%) | 1–5 (17%) | 95.8 | +0.60 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1999 | 1788 | 147.7 | — | — | — | — | -63 | -117 | -80 | 55.1% | +0.41 | 11–6 (65%) | 6–4 (60%) | 108.9 | -1.15 | 1997 | 1489 | 96.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.14 |
| 21 | 2000 | 1792 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -103 | -48 | 58.7% | +0.61 | 9–6 (60%) | 5–4 (56%) | 101.9 | -1.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 1629 | 124.7 | — | — | — | — | +13 | +69 | +76 | 48.6% | -0.06 | 7–12 (37%) | 5–5 (50%) | 93.7 | -0.20 | 1999 | 1506 | 110.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | — | — | +0.16 |
| 23 | 2002 | 1770 | 144.3 | — | — | — | — | -37 | +23 | -68 | 56.2% | +0.35 | 14–11 (56%) | 10–4 (71%) | 105.9 | -0.89 | 2000 | 1504 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | — | — | — | +0.26 |
| 24 | 2003 | 1840 | 138.9 | +1.35 | +3.00 | 1.221 | 54.2% | -60 | +48 | -96 | 58.5% | +0.48 | 12–2 (86%) | 2–3 (40%) | 108.2 | -0.85 | 2001 | 1480 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.25 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 25 | 2004 | 1810 | 147.7 | +1.35 | +0.63 | 1.034 | 51.1% | +6 | +3 | -86 | 57.9% | +0.62 | 7–9 (44%) | 6–8 (43%) | 95.0 | -1.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2005 | 1798 | 146.1 | +1.56 | +0.35 | 1.048 | 51.3% | +22 | -36 | -11 | 56.8% | +0.55 | 12–6 (67%) | 9–10 (47%) | 98.9 | +1.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 1648 | 128.2 | +0.04 | -1.40 | 0.952 | 49.0% | -1 | +72 | +148 | 42.7% | -0.42 | 7–9 (44%) | 3–7 (30%) | 92.6 | +0.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 1651 | 130.6 | -1.46 | -0.89 | 0.907 | 47.9% | -3 | +66 | +97 | 45.6% | -0.29 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–8 (33%) | 95.8 | -1.91 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 1671 | 130.8 | -1.57 | -0.33 | 0.919 | 48.2% | +12 | -28 | +59 | 45.5% | -0.24 | 4–4 (50%) | 5–5 (50%) | 99.7 | -1.85 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 1581 | 108.4 | -1.61 | -3.48 | 0.839 | 46.8% | +48 | +1 | +106 | 32.4% | -1.11 | 3–4 (43%) | 1–3 (25%) | 96.4 | -0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1919 | 143.2 | -0.42 | -0.73 | 0.953 | 49.1% | -9 | 0 | -6 | 51.4% | +0.13 | 98–90 (52%) | 60–67 (47%) | 96.4 | -1.34 | — | 1508 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | — | 25.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | +6.00 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Dementieva | 2 | 11 | 13 | Feb 14, 2009 | H2H |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | 9 | 2 | 11 | Aug 9, 2006 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 1 | 9 | 10 | Sep 21, 2007 | H2H |
| Amélie Mauresmo | 3 | 6 | 9 | Aug 27, 2008 | H2H |
| Patty Schnyder | 4 | 4 | 8 | Feb 13, 2009 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 20, 2001 | H2H |
| Dawn Buth | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 22, 2001 | H2H |
| Conchita Martínez | 0 | 1 | 1 | Nov 8, 2000 | H2H |
| Marie-Gayanay Mikaelian | 1 | 0 | 1 | Nov 7, 2000 | H2H |
| Meilen Tu | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 31, 2000 | H2H |