H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Sung-Hee Park H2H: 2-1
Nathalie Dechy holds a 2–1 lead over Sung-Hee Park in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Dechy leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 1998 US Open second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1998* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 6-2 6-4 | Sung-Hee Park | Match data |
| Sep 25, 1997* | Surabaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nathalie Dechy | 6-2 6-4 | Sung-Hee Park | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1996* | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Sung-Hee Park | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sung-Hee Park | #599 | #57 | 271 | 1,626 | 29 | 51 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nathalie Dechy | Sung-Hee Park | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #233 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #101 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #111 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #153 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |