H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nathalie Dechy vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 1-1

Nathalie Dechy and Tamarine Tanasugarn are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2009 Miami first round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 24, 2009* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Tamarine Tanasugarn #45 6-3 7-5 Nathalie Dechy #60 Match data
Aug 11, 2003 Toronto WTA 1000 R64 Hard Nathalie Dechy #24 4-6 6-3 6-4 Tamarine Tanasugarn #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,917 291 270 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Dechy Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,501 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,539 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,619 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,790 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2000 28–19 59.6% #26 1,777 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,626 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,819 0 1 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2004 33–23 58.9% #21 1,810 0 1 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,798 0 1 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,649 0 1 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,582 0 1 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4