H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Dechy vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 1-1
Nathalie Dechy and Virginia Ruano Pascual are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Virginia Ruano Pascual won the 2006 Amelia Island second round 7-6(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2006* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R64 | Clay | Virginia Ruano Pascual | 7-6(2) 6-4 | Nathalie Dechy | Match data |
| May 9, 2001* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Nathalie Dechy | 6-3 6-1 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Dechy | #88 | #11 | 1,773 | 1,917 | 291 | 270 | 51.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Dechy | Virginia Ruano Pascual | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #237 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1996 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #84 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #50 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #26 | 1,777 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #43 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #20 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #21 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 40–26 | 60.6% | #12 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #48 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2007 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #68 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2008 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #69 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2009 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #88 | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |