H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Nathalie Guerree Spitzer vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 0-2
Isabelle Demongeot holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Guerree Spitzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 58
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Isabelle Demongeot | 6-1 6-3 | Nathalie Guerree Spitzer | Match data |
| Jul 15, 1988* | Nice | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Isabelle Demongeot | 6-3 7-6 | Nathalie Guerree Spitzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Guerree Spitzer | — | — | — | 1,599 | 20 | 32 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Guerree Spitzer | Isabelle Demongeot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |