H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Guerree Spitzer vs Tami Whitlinger Jones H2H: 0-1

Tami Whitlinger Jones holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Guerree Spitzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tami Whitlinger Jones leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tami Whitlinger Jones won the 1990 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-3 6-2.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tami Whitlinger Jones 6-3 6-2 Nathalie Guerree Spitzer Match data Mar 17, 1990* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Guerree Spitzer 1,598 20 32 38.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tami Whitlinger Jones 1,777 106 135 44.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Guerree Spitzer Tami Whitlinger Jones
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
19 1988 5–4 55.6% 1,575 0 0
20 1989 5–10 33.3% 1,536 0 0 1989 4–5 44.4% 1,525 0 0
21 1990 4–7 36.4% 1,566 0 0 1990 12–16 42.9% 1,576 0 0
22 1991 4–6 40.0% 1,565 0 0 1991 17–18 48.6% 1,682 0 0
23 1992 2–5 28.6% 1,544 0 0 1992 13–16 44.8% 1,644 0 0
24 1993 13–19 40.6% 1,650 0 0
25 1994 16–18 47.1% 1,709 0 0
26 1995 19–18 51.4% 1,700 0 0
27 1996 10–13 43.5% 1,694 0 0
28 1997 2–11 15.4% 1,596 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Guerree Spitzer Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1986 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1988 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1989 2 2 4 50.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 4 5 9 44.4%
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 1992 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1993 11 10 21 52.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1994 13 12 25 52.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 1995 8 9 17 47.1% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1997 1 5 6 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 4 7 11 36.4% 13 19 32 40.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 63 73 136 46.3% 24 35 59 40.7% 7 12 19 36.8% 12 15 27 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Guerree Spitzer Tami Whitlinger Jones
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1986 1494 100.7 0.0% -1.50 0–1 -0.05
19 1988 1575 121.4 +29 52.6% +0.37 1–0 0–1 -0.17
20 1989 1536 103.4 +16 +25 38.2% -0.94 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.8 +1.00 1989 1525 121.7 +38 52.4% +0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 96.3 +0.49
21 1990 1567 121.0 +11 -15 32.0% -1.04 3–0 (100%) 1–1 -0.32 1990 1577 126.7 +71 -98 43.9% -0.17 5–5 (50%) 1–6 (14%) 96.8 +0.78
22 1991 1565 103.1 -34 +14 47.4% -0.47 0–1 2–0 +0.24 1991 1682 133.2 -51 -22 -78 49.4% -0.26 6–7 (46%) 8–2 (80%) 106.6 -0.08
23 1992 1544 102.6 +15 29.4% -1.47 2–1 (67%) 0–2 -0.27 1992 1645 120.9 +15 -10 41.0% -0.59 4–1 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.8 -0.65
24 1993 1651 135.8 +45 -78 -87 41.7% -0.75 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 99.7 -1.72
25 1994 1709 145.5 +28 45.8% -0.15 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -1.10
26 1995 1701 136.6 -14 -37 -134 53.8% +0.30 6–11 (35%) 6–4 (60%) 96.8 -1.16
27 1996 1694 132.0 +28 -56 42.3% -0.48 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 103.6 -0.18
28 1997 1596 120.8 +84 -20 25.8% -1.55 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 93.1 -0.98
Career 1599 114.7 +1 +19 39.5% -0.74 7–5 (58%) 4–6 (40%) 101.2 +0.92 1778 139.7 +23 -42 -104 45.0% -0.32 33–44 (43%) 25–32 (44%) 97.2 -1.94

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.