H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Andrea Strnadova H2H: 1-0

Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Strnadova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1989 Moscow round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Andrea Strnadova
CZE Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #131 6-3 6-3 Andrea Strnadova #239 Match data Oct 12, 1989* R32 Moscow WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Andrea Strnadova #363 #33 32 1,787 65 73 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Andrea Strnadova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #203 1,486 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1990 3–4 42.9% #143 1,525 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1991 23–18 56.1% #34 1,717 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1992 25–18 58.1% #37 1,754 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1993 8–20 28.6% #158 1,584 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1994 6–12 33.3% #127 1,519 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Andrea Strnadova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1992 18 10 28 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 3 10 13 23.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 42 40 82 51.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 9 16 25 36.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Andrea Strnadova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1989 1487 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1990 1525 110.2 — — — — +26 — — 50.0% -0.81 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.25
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1991 1717 141.5 — — — — -9 -138 -89 56.8% +0.26 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 98.6 +0.37
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1992 1755 139.9 — — — — +47 -166 — 57.1% +0.58 8–6 (57%) 7–5 (58%) 104.6 +1.98
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1993 1585 113.5 — — — — +10 +25 +17 33.8% -1.08 3–6 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 93.0 -0.06
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1994 1520 106.5 — — — — +24 — — 40.0% -0.60 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.4 +1.20
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1787 132.8 — — — — +20 -87 -42 49.2% -0.11 15–22 (41%) 16–13 (55%) 98.0 +2.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.