H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Ann Grossman H2H: 2-0

Nathalie Herreman holds a 2–0 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1990 Wimbledon round of 64 6-0 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Ann Grossman
USA Age 55 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #72 6-0 6-2 Ann Grossman #50 Match data Jun 29, 1990* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Nathalie Herreman #95 7-5 6-1 Ann Grossman #48 Match data Jan 5, 1989* R32 Brisbane International WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Ann Grossman #343 #29 384 1,887 187 185 50.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Ann Grossman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% #378 1,497 0 0
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1988 15–12 55.6% #48 1,699 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1989 23–20 53.5% #54 1,736 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1990 23–22 51.1% #50 1,748 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1991 12–19 38.7% #89 1,638 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1992 23–17 57.5% #36 1,733 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1993 30–19 61.2% #35 1,804 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1994 27–21 56.2% #37 1,853 0 0
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1995 12–19 38.7% #88 1,681 0 0
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1996 10–14 41.7% #72 1,665 0 0
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1997 10–17 37.0% #75 1,615 0 0
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 1998 2–4 33.3% #283 1,595 0 0
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Ann Grossman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 13 11 24 54.2% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 16 11 27 59.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 9 12 21 42.9% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 15 8 23 65.2% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 21 12 33 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 16 10 26 61.5% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 5 10 15 33.3% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 8 9 17 47.1% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 3 9 12 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 111 106 217 51.2% 59 56 115 51.3% 6 9 15 40.0% 11 14 25 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Ann Grossman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1987 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.15
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1988 1699 133.9 — — — — +28 — — 54.1% +0.13 4–3 (57%) 0–5 (0%) 100.1 +0.16
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1989 1737 136.2 — — — — +43 -89 — 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 4–5 (44%) 101.2 -1.22
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1990 1749 136.3 — — — — -12 +8 — 51.0% +0.02 7–7 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -1.48
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1991 1638 126.7 — — — — -16 +89 — 44.3% +0.06 3–7 (30%) 2–6 (25%) 91.9 +0.49
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1992 1733 132.9 — — — — +24 -9 — 52.9% -0.03 6–3 (67%) 6–1 (86%) 108.7 +1.73
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1993 1805 140.5 — — — — +9 -60 — 59.6% +0.62 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 103.6 +0.77
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1994 1853 146.2 — — — — 0 -73 -249 53.6% -0.01 10–6 (63%) 5–2 (71%) 107.3 -1.02
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1995 1681 123.7 — — — — +38 +44 — 40.8% -0.46 4–5 (44%) 3–9 (25%) 92.7 +0.33
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1996 1666 130.2 — — — — +49 +8 — 42.9% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 0–2 — -0.99
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1997 1615 123.7 — — — — +26 +98 — 38.6% -1.25 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 97.1 -0.41
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 1998 1595 103.2 — — — — +41 +76 — 33.3% -1.58 — 1–0 — +0.11
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1888 140.3 — — — — +18 +6 -249 49.9% -0.10 53–53 (50%) 31–39 (44%) 99.5 -0.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.