H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Bettina Fulco H2H: 0-1

Bettina Fulco holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bettina Fulco leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bettina Fulco won the 1991 Barcelona round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Bettina Fulco
ARG Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bettina Fulco #147 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #115 Match data Apr 25, 1991* R32 Barcelona Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Bettina Fulco #770 #23 197 1,873 139 153 47.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Bettina Fulco
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% #248 1,482 0 0
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1986 10–7 58.8% #116 1,565 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1987 24–17 58.5% #40 1,735 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1988 34–21 61.8% #24 1,776 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1989 19–15 55.9% #47 1,740 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1990 9–21 30.0% #131 1,567 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1991 12–15 44.4% #76 1,621 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1992 12–17 41.4% #83 1,622 0 0
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1993 4–13 23.5% #290 1,561 0 0
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1994 5–9 35.7% #88 1,546 0 0
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1995 6–9 40.0% #142 1,577 0 0
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 1996 4–6 40.0% #133 1,575 0 0
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 1997 0–2 0.0% #247 1,550 0 0
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Bettina Fulco
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 21 12 33 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 6 8 14 42.9% 28 13 41 68.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — — — — —
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 6 10 16 37.5% 3 11 14 21.4% — — — — — — — —
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 2 3 5 40.0% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 3 5 8 37.5% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — —
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 26 45 71 36.6% 110 101 211 52.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Bettina Fulco
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1985 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.03
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1986 1565 108.7 — — — — +11 +42 — 54.1% +0.59 3–0 (100%) 1–1 — +2.59
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1987 1735 150.5 — — — — -167 +62 -112 55.7% +0.74 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 103.6 -1.62
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1988 1776 144.7 — — — — -219 +178 — 58.5% +0.73 7–5 (58%) 0–6 (0%) 96.3 -0.75
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1989 1740 135.3 — — — — -190 +140 — 51.9% +0.01 8–3 (73%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.72
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1990 1567 119.5 — — — — -4 +86 — 33.3% -1.33 4–5 (44%) 4–4 (50%) 99.4 -1.41
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1991 1622 127.2 — — — — -67 +48 — 47.5% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -0.89
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1992 1622 118.8 — — — — -72 +70 — 40.0% -0.95 5–2 (71%) 2–4 (33%) 103.6 -0.19
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1993 1562 112.3 — — — — -38 +40 — 28.9% -1.66 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.60
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1994 1547 118.6 — — — — — +70 — 37.5% -0.87 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — +0.82
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1995 1578 113.5 — — — — -73 +46 — 41.9% -0.97 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — -0.59
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 1996 1575 112.7 — — — — — +11 — 40.9% -0.41 1–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.26
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 1997 1550 97.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 — — +0.05
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1874 135.9 — — — — -90 +91 -112 46.9% -0.23 41–30 (58%) 16–26 (38%) 98.3 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.