H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Elena Brioukhovets H2H: 1-1

Nathalie Herreman and Elena Brioukhovets are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Brioukhovets leads 1–0 on clay, while Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1991 US Open round of 64 3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Elena Brioukhovets
UKR Age 55

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #136 3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Elena Brioukhovets #54 Match data Aug 29, 1991* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Elena Brioukhovets #59 6-3 7-5 Nathalie Herreman #110 Match data May 23, 1991* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Elena Brioukhovets #627 #46 124 1,687 44 64 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Elena Brioukhovets
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% #184 1,518 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1990 9–6 60.0% #73 1,609 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1991 13–18 41.9% #97 1,634 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1992 7–12 36.8% #132 1,602 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1993 7–12 36.8% #121 1,619 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1994 5–12 29.4% #129 1,542 0 0
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1995 2–2 50.0% #293 1,543 0 0
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #306 1,526 0 0
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Elena Brioukhovets
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 1 5 80.0%
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1991 2 6 8 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 9 19 28 32.1% 15 20 35 42.9% 10 12 22 45.5% 10 13 23 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Elena Brioukhovets
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1989 1519 108.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.22
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1990 1609 117.3 — — — — +49 — -52 58.8% +0.59 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — +1.40
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1991 1635 126.7 — — — — -53 +9 -43 41.8% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 -0.73
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1992 1602 120.0 — — — — -42 +19 -3 41.9% -0.72 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — +1.36
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1993 1620 128.9 — — — — -65 +11 +31 41.3% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.6 -1.11
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1994 1543 103.5 — — — — -42 +79 +72 37.5% -1.40 1–5 (17%) 0–1 — +0.87
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1995 1543 100.3 — — — — -37 — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.41
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1997 1526 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1687 124.5 — — — — -28 +28 +9 43.7% -0.51 12–21 (36%) 8–10 (44%) 97.2 +1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.