H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Federica Bonsignori H2H: 1-3

Federica Bonsignori holds a 3–1 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Federica Bonsignori leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Federica Bonsignori won the 1992 Roland Garros round of 128 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Federica Bonsignori
ITA Age 58

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Federica Bonsignori #110 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #123 Match data May 27, 1992* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Federica Bonsignori #30 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #109 Match data May 29, 1991* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Federica Bonsignori #32 6-4 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #116 Match data May 4, 1991* R16 Taranto Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Nathalie Herreman 7-5 6-4 Federica Bonsignori Match data May 29, 1985* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Federica Bonsignori #813 #28 30 1,709 75 112 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Federica Bonsignori
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1984 1–5 16.7% #144 1,481 0 0
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1985 6–7 46.2% #142 1,498 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1986 6–6 50.0% #122 1,522 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1987 11–14 44.0% #90 1,567 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1988 8–16 33.3% #101 1,500 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1989 4–10 28.6% #143 1,463 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1990 10–8 55.6% #77 1,574 0 1
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1991 12–13 48.0% #50 1,597 0 1
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1992 11–14 44.0% #64 1,639 0 1
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1993 5–13 27.8% #114 1,562 0 1
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1994 1–5 16.7% #211 1,529 0 1
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 1995 0–1 0.0% #232 1,516 0 1
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Federica Bonsignori
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 — — — — 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% 7 13 20 35.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 10 4 14 71.4% — — — — — — — —
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 — — — — 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 11 12 23 47.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 5 10 15 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 4 18 22 18.2% 68 87 155 43.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Federica Bonsignori
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1984 1482 97.6 — — — — — +52 — 23.1% -2.23 0–1 — — +0.02
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1985 1499 111.1 — — — — — +15 — 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.80
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1986 1523 112.0 — — — — — +11 — 53.8% +0.62 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +1.77
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1987 1568 117.6 — — — — -20 +19 — 42.4% -0.47 6–3 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 104.2 +0.64
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1988 1500 111.7 — — — — +26 +9 — 36.8% -1.18 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 99.7 +0.56
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1989 1464 102.7 — — — — +19 +47 — 34.4% -0.91 1–3 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 +1.62
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1990 1575 111.2 — — — — -136 +82 — 52.2% -0.04 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 +1.14
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1991 1598 122.9 — — — — — +46 — 46.3% -0.33 3–3 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 +0.57
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1992 1639 119.7 — — — — — +61 — 47.4% -0.44 2–5 (29%) 1–1 — +0.04
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1993 1563 114.5 — — — — -162 +44 — 32.6% -1.42 3–4 (43%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.45
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1994 1530 108.9 — — — — — +57 — 23.1% -1.77 0–1 — — -0.17
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 1995 1517 97.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.08
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1709 118.7 — — — — -48 +39 — 42.0% -0.62 26–33 (44%) 16–22 (42%) 94.8 +3.54

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.