H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Herreman vs Federica Bonsignori H2H: 1-3
Federica Bonsignori holds a 3–1 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Federica Bonsignori leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Federica Bonsignori won the 1992 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 58
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 1992* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Federica Bonsignori | 6-3 6-4 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| May 29, 1991* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Federica Bonsignori | 6-3 6-4 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| May 4, 1991* | Taranto | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Federica Bonsignori | 6-4 6-3 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| May 29, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Nathalie Herreman | 7-5 6-4 | Federica Bonsignori | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Federica Bonsignori | #813 | #28 | 30 | 1,709 | 75 | 112 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Herreman | Federica Bonsignori | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #144 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #142 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #122 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #50 | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #64 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #114 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #211 | 1,531 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |