H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Isabel Cueto H2H: 0-2

Isabel Cueto holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Isabel Cueto leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Isabel Cueto won the 1990 Barcelona round of 16 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Isabel Cueto
GER Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Isabel Cueto #28 6-3 6-0 Nathalie Herreman #91 Match data Apr 27, 1990* R16 Barcelona Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Isabel Cueto 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Herreman Match data May 30, 1985* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Isabel Cueto #256 #20 45 1,885 130 101 56.3% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Isabel Cueto
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1984 1–2 33.3% #168 1,509 0 0
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1985 6–9 40.0% #165 1,520 0 0
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1986 12–16 42.9% #101 1,538 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1987 30–17 63.8% #29 1,761 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1988 27–15 64.3% #31 1,825 0 2
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1989 24–12 66.7% #28 1,816 0 4
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1990 23–14 62.2% #26 1,799 0 5
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1991 7–11 38.9% #117 1,662 0 5
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1992 0–5 0.0% #283 1,590 0 5
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Isabel Cueto
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 25 12 37 67.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 2 2 4 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% — — — — — — — —
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 12 21 33 36.4% 116 72 188 61.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Isabel Cueto
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1509 106.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.12
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1985 1521 110.4 — — — — +17 +59 — 44.4% -0.39 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.3 +1.55
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1986 1539 121.5 — — — — -48 +97 — 43.8% -0.06 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.0 +2.15
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1987 1761 135.7 — — — — -187 +64 — 57.5% +0.56 11–1 (92%) 3–5 (38%) 110.5 +3.28
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1988 1826 141.4 — — — — -254 +103 — 62.0% +1.03 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 +0.40
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1989 1817 132.8 — — — — — +87 — 64.6% +1.01 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) 98.8 +1.58
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1990 1799 139.4 — — — — -220 +80 — 60.2% +0.75 5–4 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 97.0 -0.94
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1991 1662 120.0 — — — — -82 +47 — 45.2% -0.19 3–5 (38%) 0–4 (0%) 91.6 +0.03
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1992 1591 97.8 — — — — -65 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.24
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1885 137.0 — — — — -131 +81 — 55.3% +0.47 36–25 (59%) 20–30 (40%) 95.9 +3.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.