H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 1-2

Isabelle Demongeot holds a 2–1 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Isabelle Demongeot leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1990 San Diego round of 32 4-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Isabelle Demongeot
FRA Age 59 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #54 4-6 6-2 6-2 Isabelle Demongeot #74 Match data Aug 9, 1990* R32 San Diego Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Isabelle Demongeot #67 7-5 7-5 Nathalie Herreman #79 Match data Aug 13, 1987* R32 Los Angeles WTA 500 Hard
Isabelle Demongeot #112 6-1 6-1 Nathalie Herreman Match data Jul 18, 1985* R32 Bregenz WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Isabelle Demongeot #522 #35 69 1,841 119 157 43.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Isabelle Demongeot
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1984 1–1 50.0% #165 1,513 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1985 4–7 36.4% #135 1,520 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1986 11–15 42.3% #65 1,608 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1987 17–20 45.9% #53 1,732 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1988 19–19 50.0% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1989 18–15 54.5% #46 1,766 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1990 15–17 46.9% #78 1,687 0 0
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1991 13–14 48.1% #63 1,683 0 1
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1992 7–17 29.2% #136 1,626 0 1
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1993 5–11 31.2% #150 1,592 0 1
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 1994 3–9 25.0% #130 1,541 0 1
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 1995 5–9 35.7% #160 1,546 0 1
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 1996 1–3 25.0% #242 1,529 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Isabelle Demongeot
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1984 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1987 7 8 15 46.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1988 5 8 13 38.5% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 11 9 20 55.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 10 8 18 55.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1992 3 11 14 21.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 58 70 128 45.3% 30 43 73 41.1% 19 23 42 45.2% 12 21 33 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Isabelle Demongeot
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1984 1514 102.8 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — +0.09
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1985 1520 106.0 — — — — — +7 +100 36.4% -0.95 — — — +0.76
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1986 1609 129.8 — — — — -40 -65 +53 45.8% -0.20 2–5 (29%) 2–5 (29%) 96.1 +0.38
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1987 1732 140.6 — — — — -56 -238 +22 45.2% -0.20 6–4 (60%) 0–1 — -0.92
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1988 1759 143.5 — — — — -71 -64 -55 53.9% +0.18 5–10 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.3 -3.79
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1989 1766 145.5 — — — — -4 -36 -73 53.3% +0.31 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 101.0 -3.59
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1990 1688 134.0 — — — — +77 -6 — 43.5% -0.58 5–4 (56%) 3–1 (75%) 103.7 -1.98
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1991 1683 123.3 — — — — +67 -79 — 52.5% -0.12 2–5 (29%) 6–1 (86%) 98.5 +0.46
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1992 1626 122.8 — — — — -19 -17 +52 32.7% -0.90 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 96.6 -1.74
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1993 1593 116.2 — — — — +3 -6 — 33.3% -1.23 4–3 (57%) 1–0 — -0.63
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 1994 1542 110.1 — — — — +37 +40 — 29.6% -1.11 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) 95.9 +0.54
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 1995 1547 116.6 — — — — +52 -12 +36 38.7% -0.45 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.04
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 1996 1530 101.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.88 — 1–0 — +0.15
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1842 138.1 — — — — +1 -50 +21 44.7% -0.34 32–42 (43%) 24–19 (56%) 99.7 -3.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.