H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Katarzyna Nowak H2H: 0-1

Katarzyna Nowak holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katarzyna Nowak leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Katarzyna Nowak won the 1992 Cesena quarterfinal 6-4 2-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Katarzyna Nowak
POL Age 57 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Katarzyna Nowak #133 6-4 2-6 7-6 Nathalie Herreman #130 Match data Feb 22, 1992* QF Cesena Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Katarzyna Nowak #855 #47 162 1,659 26 51 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Katarzyna Nowak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1989 0–1 0.0% #285 1,488 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1990 0–3 0.0% #161 1,451 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1991 2–5 28.6% #150 1,457 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1992 6–11 35.3% #114 1,507 0 0
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1993 2–4 33.3% #195 1,514 0 0
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1994 2–3 40.0% #94 1,532 0 0
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1995 10–11 47.6% #59 1,608 0 0
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 1996 4–13 23.5% #137 1,543 0 0
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Katarzyna Nowak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 0 4 4 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 0 10 10 0.0% 18 28 46 39.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 11 18 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Katarzyna Nowak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1989 1488 97.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.07
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1990 1452 98.5 — — — — — +17 — 14.3% -1.29 0–1 0–2 — +0.19
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1991 1458 97.3 — — — — +63 +15 — 16.7% -2.83 — — — -0.13
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1992 1508 109.5 — — — — +62 -73 — 35.9% -1.44 3–2 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 102.0 +0.66
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1993 1515 104.4 — — — — +11 -34 — 43.8% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.19
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1994 1533 108.3 — — — — — +6 — 41.7% -1.08 1–1 1–0 — +0.20
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1995 1608 119.3 — — — — -122 +29 — 47.8% -0.63 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 102.3 +0.18
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 1996 1544 99.3 — — — — -100 +64 — 25.0% -2.33 1–1 0–1 — +0.45
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1660 109.9 — — — — -8 +18 — 35.3% -1.44 8–10 (44%) 7–7 (50%) 100.6 +1.86

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.