H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Kimberly Kessaris H2H: 0-1

Kimberly Kessaris holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kimberly Kessaris leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kimberly Kessaris won the 1989 Wimbledon round of 128 1-6 6-4 6-3.

FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kimberly Kessaris 1-6 6-4 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #122 Match data Jun 28, 1989* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Kimberly Kessaris 1,548 7 18 28.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Nathalie Herreman Kimberly Kessaris
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1982 0–1 0.0% 1,492 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% 1,509 0 0
1983 4–3 57.1% 1,547 0 0 1988 0–3 0.0% 1,496 0 0
1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1989 6–13 31.6% 1,467 0 0
1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% 1,457 0 0
1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1
1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1
1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1
1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1
1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1
1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1
1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1
1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1
1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1
1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Nathalie Herreman Kimberly Kessaris
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0%
1983 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 3 7 10 30.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
1985 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 1 1 0.0%
1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
1995 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% Career 3 10 13 23.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Nathalie Herreman Kimberly Kessaris
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1982 1492 99.9 0.0% -2.00 -0.01 1987 1509 100.7 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0.00
1983 1548 103.2 +61 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 +0.65 1988 1496 109.9 0.0% -3.83 -0.47
1984 1564 106.0 +9 +37 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1989 1468 108.0 +38 +76 +64 33.3% -1.21 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.7 +1.29
1985 1543 100.6 -28 40.0% -1.30 0–2 +0.91 1990 1457 96.6 0.0% -3.00 0–1 +0.10
1986 1718 137.8 -77 -14 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39
1987 1641 121.1 -12 -7 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60
1988 1606 116.4 +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 +0.90
1989 1568 127.3 +91 -64 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56
1990 1683 140.3 +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70
1991 1618 118.4 +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07
1992 1556 118.1 +62 -82 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 -0.27
1993 1623 124.9 +8 -99 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 -0.45
1994 1585 103.8 +19 -41 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 -0.34
1995 1581 100.9 0.0% -3.50 -0.22
Career 1727 129.0 +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 Career 1549 107.4 +38 +76 +64 29.1% -1.47 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 99.2 +3.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.