H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Laura Garrone H2H: 0-1

Laura Garrone holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Garrone leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Garrone won the 1986 Berlin Open round of 32 7-6 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Garrone
ITA Age 58 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Garrone #62 7-6 6-0 Nathalie Herreman #106 Match data May 15, 1986* R32 Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Laura Garrone #262 #32 90 1,726 109 130 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Laura Garrone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% #234 1,491 0 0
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1985 5–5 50.0% #203 1,530 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1986 22–14 61.1% #38 1,678 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1987 15–17 46.9% #86 1,611 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1988 17–17 50.0% #64 1,637 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1989 14–17 45.2% #87 1,607 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1990 14–15 48.3% #65 1,609 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1991 10–14 41.7% #93 1,622 0 0
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1992 5–12 29.4% #156 1,559 0 0
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1993 0–3 0.0% #169 1,521 0 0
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1994 2–5 28.6% #167 1,519 0 0
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 1995 2–5 28.6% #194 1,492 0 0
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 1996 1–3 25.0% #258 1,467 0 0
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 1997 2–2 50.0% #224 1,501 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Laura Garrone
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 20 9 29 69.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 3 7 10 30.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 2 2 4 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 — — — — 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 12 22 34 35.3% 88 90 178 49.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 4 11 15 26.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Laura Garrone
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1984 1491 101.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.04
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1985 1530 112.1 — — — — +27 +58 — 50.0% +0.09 1–1 — — +1.29
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1986 1679 134.8 — — — — -125 +127 — 60.2% +0.82 5–6 (45%) 3–4 (43%) 98.8 +2.90
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1987 1612 116.6 — — — — -75 +112 -43 46.7% -0.13 6–7 (46%) 0–3 (0%) 95.4 +4.27
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1988 1638 122.2 — — — — -120 +69 — 49.4% -0.04 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.6 +1.56
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1989 1608 123.3 — — — — -78 +56 — 44.1% -0.31 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +2.18
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1990 1609 114.2 — — — — -61 +31 — 47.8% +0.03 5–6 (45%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +1.49
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1991 1623 119.5 — — — — -83 -31 +17 42.6% -0.87 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.5 -0.55
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1992 1559 114.1 — — — — -34 +20 — 32.4% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 101.6 -0.10
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1993 1522 103.3 — — — — — +11 — 25.0% -1.37 0–2 — — -0.08
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1994 1520 113.3 — — — — — +23 — 37.5% -0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.17
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 1995 1492 97.8 — — — — — +14 — 31.3% -1.50 1–1 — — +0.33
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 1996 1468 98.9 — — — — — +5 — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 0–1 — +0.48
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 1997 1501 112.4 — — — — — +13 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — -0.18
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1726 125.1 — — — — -79 +56 -17 46.4% -0.19 36–45 (44%) 18–21 (46%) 97.2 +5.60

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.