H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Laxmi Poruri H2H: 1-0

Nathalie Herreman holds a 1–0 lead over Laxmi Poruri in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1990 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Laxmi Poruri
USA Age 53 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #147 6-4 6-0 Laxmi Poruri #163 Match data Feb 26, 1990 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Laxmi Poruri #635 #110 209 1,556 14 30 31.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Laxmi Poruri
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1988 2–2 50.0% #191 1,532 0 0
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1989 3–6 33.3% #167 1,536 0 0
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1990 0–2 0.0% #416 1,505 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1994 0–1 0.0% #196 1,483 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1995 7–9 43.8% #145 1,523 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1996 2–9 18.2% #111 1,478 0 0
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Laxmi Poruri
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 9 18 27 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Laxmi Poruri
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1532 119.1 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.89 1–0 1–0 — -0.18
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1989 1537 111.3 — — — — +5 — — 35.0% -0.45 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.15
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1990 1506 95.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.33
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1993 1489 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–2 — +0.13
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1994 1483 101.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.19
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1995 1524 112.1 — — — — +10 — — 41.0% -0.85 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 106.2 -0.01
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1996 1478 111.8 — — — — +21 — — 28.6% -1.54 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — -0.10
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1556 115.5 — — — — +12 — — 34.3% -1.08 9–8 (53%) 5–8 (38%) 100.3 +0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.