H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 0-1

Leila Meskhi holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leila Meskhi leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1991 Bayonne round of 16 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Leila Meskhi
GEO Age 58 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Leila Meskhi #13 6-3 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #125 Match data Sep 27, 1991* R16 Bayonne Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Leila Meskhi #903 #12 72 1,987 193 121 61.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Leila Meskhi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1987 11–7 61.1% #46 1,655 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1988 18–18 50.0% #46 1,696 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1989 21–14 60.0% #30 1,794 0 1
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1990 38–14 73.1% #19 1,928 0 3
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1991 30–14 68.2% #15 1,936 0 4
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1992 26–16 61.9% #22 1,928 0 4
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1993 22–17 56.4% #37 1,871 0 4
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1994 22–15 59.5% #34 1,842 0 4
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 1995 5–2 71.4% #141 1,832 0 5
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 1996 0–4 0.0% #838 1,746 0 5
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Leila Meskhi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1988 15 12 27 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 19 5 24 79.2% 12 7 19 63.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 0 5 100.0%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 11 5 16 68.8% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1992 9 6 15 60.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1996 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 101 58 159 63.5% 64 39 103 62.1% 3 8 11 27.3% 25 16 41 61.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Leila Meskhi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1987 1656 134.5 — — — — +27 -63 — 64.1% +1.05 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.80
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1988 1696 129.7 — — — — +32 — -166 49.4% -0.23 8–5 (62%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +0.65
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1989 1795 139.4 — — — — +11 -135 — 59.2% +0.57 3–3 (50%) 8–0 (100%) 108.0 -1.90
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1990 1928 151.0 — — — — +5 -112 -373 66.4% +1.63 10–3 (77%) 3–6 (33%) 102.3 +1.11
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1991 1937 151.3 — — — — -20 +20 — 62.6% +0.74 9–4 (69%) 5–5 (50%) 105.3 +0.25
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1992 1928 157.9 — — — — -26 +60 — 61.5% +1.16 7–4 (64%) 3–8 (27%) 96.9 -1.71
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1993 1872 148.4 — — — — -2 +90 — 55.3% +0.05 4–3 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 100.4 -1.93
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1994 1843 148.6 — — — — -3 +108 — 55.2% +0.72 9–4 (69%) 3–3 (50%) 102.8 +0.52
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 1995 1833 120.0 — — — — 0 — — 73.3% +1.87 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 98.8 +0.23
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 1996 1747 89.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.63 — — — -0.21
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1987 152.8 — — — — +2 0 -270 58.9% +0.70 52–30 (63%) 28–33 (46%) 103.7 -0.70

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.