H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 0-1

Mareen Louie Harper holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mareen Louie Harper leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mareen Louie Harper won the 1988 Wichita round of 16 4-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Mareen Louie Harper
USA Age 66

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mareen Louie Harper 4-6 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #88 Match data Mar 4, 1988* R16 Wichita WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mareen Louie Harper — — — 1,910 177 239 42.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Mareen Louie Harper
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,523 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,521 0 0
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,519 0 0
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1978 7–12 36.8% — 1,588 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1979 4–13 23.5% — 1,568 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1980 22–23 48.9% — 1,714 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1981 16–20 44.4% — 1,743 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1982 9–18 33.3% — 1,654 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1983 7–10 41.2% — 1,671 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1984 18–17 51.4% — 1,733 0 1
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1985 29–18 61.7% — 1,776 0 2
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1986 12–17 41.4% — 1,679 0 2
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1987 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 2
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 1988 12–17 41.4% — 1,613 0 2
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 1989 6–14 30.0% — 1,576 0 2
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 1990 10–15 40.0% — 1,590 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1991 12–16 42.9% — 1,614 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,545 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% — 1,536 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Mareen Louie Harper
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 11 18 38.9%
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1981 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 10 19 47.4%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1984 14 9 23 60.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3%
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 8 11 19 42.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1989 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 104 118 222 46.8% 10 16 26 38.5% 16 27 43 37.2% 47 78 125 37.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Mareen Louie Harper
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1524 102.4 — — — — +72 — — 57.1% +0.29 1–0 1–0 — +0.56
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1522 100.6 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.36
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1977 1520 116.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.35
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1978 1589 122.4 — — — — +31 -31 — 34.1% -1.25 5–1 (83%) 2–1 (67%) 108.1 -0.33
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1979 1568 121.3 — — — — +25 — — 30.0% -1.90 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.42
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1980 1714 128.5 — — — — -41 -153 -36 46.2% -0.59 12–4 (75%) 2–6 (25%) 107.6 +1.57
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1981 1743 134.3 — — — — -2 — -72 42.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 -1.63
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1982 1655 124.8 — — — — -27 -46 — 35.5% -1.06 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 -1.27
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1983 1671 132.0 — — — — -14 — — 42.9% -0.43 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.4 -0.99
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1984 1733 127.5 — — — — +24 — -94 48.8% -0.05 7–3 (70%) 2–3 (40%) 105.0 +0.67
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1985 1777 143.7 — — — — +52 — -157 58.5% +0.41 8–4 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 101.8 -0.01
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1986 1680 121.2 — — — — +20 — -65 39.1% -0.55 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 97.5 +1.39
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1987 1624 119.5 — — — — +6 — -17 38.6% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — +0.33
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 1988 1614 129.1 — — — — +11 — — 43.3% -0.43 4–5 (44%) 5–4 (56%) 100.4 -0.29
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 1989 1576 117.3 — — — — -17 — -21 32.0% -1.38 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 107.4 -1.33
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 1990 1590 128.4 — — — — +10 — — 45.8% -0.14 2–7 (22%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1615 127.2 — — — — -4 — -50 39.4% -0.53 8–4 (67%) 4–4 (50%) 105.2 +0.46
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1545 105.4 — — — — -7 — — 25.0% -1.81 0–2 1–0 — -0.11
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1537 103.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.17
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1911 135.2 — — — — +7 -78 -59 42.4% -0.57 76–56 (58%) 40–42 (49%) 107.5 -0.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.