H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 1-1

Nathalie Herreman and Mercedes Paz are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1992 Strasbourg Open round of 32 6-2 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Mercedes Paz
ARG Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mercedes Paz #75 6-2 3-6 7-5 Nathalie Herreman #123 Match data May 21, 1992* R32 Strasbourg Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Nathalie Herreman #64 6-2 3-6 7-6 Mercedes Paz #110 Match data Jul 11, 1987* QF Knokke WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mercedes Paz #521 #28 185 1,822 145 184 44.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Mercedes Paz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1985 7–11 38.9% #115 1,526 0 1
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1986 22–23 48.9% #60 1,577 0 1
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1987 15–20 42.9% #88 1,637 0 1
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1988 24–15 61.5% #44 1,779 0 2
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1989 13–19 40.6% #91 1,647 0 2
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1990 25–20 55.6% #32 1,775 0 3
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1991 19–23 45.2% #71 1,683 0 3
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1992 10–19 34.5% #107 1,606 0 3
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 1993 2–11 15.4% #213 1,491 0 3
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 1994 3–10 23.1% #140 1,474 0 3
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 1995 4–8 33.3% #164 1,451 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1996 1–5 16.7% #124 1,442 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Mercedes Paz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 2 4 6 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1986 8 10 18 44.4% 13 8 21 61.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1987 4 4 8 50.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 11 5 16 68.8% 13 10 23 56.5% — — — — — — — —
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 0 6 6 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 3 4 7 42.9% 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 9 11 20 45.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 0 5 5 0.0% 10 12 22 45.5% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 41 57 98 41.8% 93 98 191 48.7% 3 12 15 20.0% 8 17 25 32.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Mercedes Paz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1985 1526 110.7 — — — — +40 +38 — 40.9% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — +0.74
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1986 1577 119.8 — — — — -30 +125 — 50.5% +0.08 7–10 (41%) 7–3 (70%) 100.7 +3.38
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1987 1637 131.6 — — — — -16 +33 — 45.6% -0.18 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 97.5 -0.70
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1988 1780 134.3 — — — — -56 -13 — 57.5% +0.52 7–2 (78%) 4–3 (57%) 106.9 +0.57
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1989 1648 125.8 — — — — -60 +126 — 45.9% -0.22 2–8 (20%) 8–7 (53%) 94.4 +0.43
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1990 1776 143.2 — — — — -121 +116 — 54.3% +0.15 8–9 (47%) 7–7 (50%) 101.6 -2.36
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1991 1684 124.3 — — — — +2 +72 — 45.2% -0.53 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 102.6 +1.48
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1992 1606 128.7 — — — — -21 +95 — 42.6% -0.54 1–9 (10%) 2–1 (67%) 91.7 -1.41
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 1993 1491 102.6 — — — — +47 +87 — 24.1% -1.38 0–5 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.61
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 1994 1474 115.3 — — — — +29 +93 — 22.2% -1.81 0–1 1–1 — +0.31
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 1995 1452 102.8 — — — — +50 +58 — 36.0% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.83
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1442 97.8 — — — — — +17 — 16.7% -2.67 — 0–1 — +0.03
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1822 131.0 — — — — -28 +76 — 45.9% -0.29 37–61 (38%) 38–33 (54%) 96.4 +1.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.