H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nathalie Herreman vs Sabine Hack H2H: 0-2
Sabine Hack holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sabine Hack leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sabine Hack won the 1989 Archaron third round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1989* | Archaron | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Sabine Hack | 7-6 6-4 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1988* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Sabine Hack | 5-7 6-0 6-1 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Sabine Hack | #523 | #13 | 577 | 1,996 | 180 | 135 | 57.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Herreman | Sabine Hack | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #262 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #146 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #74 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #45 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #35 | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #24 | 1,854 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #40 | 1,729 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #43 | 1,706 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #523 | 1,648 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |