H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-3

Sandra Cecchini holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1992 Linz fourth round 1-6 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 14, 1992* Linz WTA 500 R16 Carpet Sandra Cecchini #28 1-6 6-2 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #136 Match data
Sep 22, 1989* Paris WTA 500 R16 Clay Sandra Cecchini #32 7-5 6-3 Nathalie Herreman #129 Match data
Oct 29, 1988* Brighton WTA 250 R16 Carpet Sandra Cecchini #21 6-2 3-6 6-4 Nathalie Herreman #112 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,728 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,937 299 215 58.2% 0 0 0 3 8 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,548 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,485 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,564 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,497 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,543 0 0 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,718 0 1 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,641 0 1 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,635 0 3
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,606 0 1 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,860 0 5
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1988 34–14 70.8% #21 1,845 0 7
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,684 0 1 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,619 0 1 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,815 0 9
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,776 0 10
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,622 0 1 1992 23–15 60.5% #34 1,824 0 11
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,725 0 11
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,629 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,610 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,556 0 11