H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Silke Frankl H2H: 0-1

Silke Frankl holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Silke Frankl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Silke Frankl won the 1990 Hamburg Open round of 64 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Silke Frankl
GER Age 56

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Silke Frankl #175 6-1 6-1 Nathalie Herreman #90 Match data May 2, 1990* R64 Hamburg Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Silke Frankl #940 #67 40 1,649 42 77 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Silke Frankl
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1988 7–9 43.8% #122 1,525 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1989 0–6 0.0% #186 1,457 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1990 3–5 37.5% #160 1,478 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1991 7–11 38.9% #119 1,505 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1992 9–14 39.1% #117 1,557 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1993 7–11 38.9% #93 1,584 0 0
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1994 9–12 42.9% #78 1,583 0 0
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1995 0–9 0.0% #421 1,490 0 0
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Silke Frankl
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 1 2 3 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 — — — — 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 4 14 18 22.2% 34 49 83 41.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 8 8 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Silke Frankl
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.16 1988 1525 107.1 — — — — -4 +53 — 40.0% -0.69 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) — +1.10
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1989 1457 96.0 — — — — — +40 — 14.3% -2.71 0–2 1–1 — +0.23
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +1.39 1990 1479 108.6 — — — — +37 +16 — 47.4% -0.37 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.07
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.60 1991 1506 111.4 — — — — -53 +73 — 39.0% -0.88 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.45
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1992 1557 108.4 — — — — -107 +55 — 34.7% -1.22 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — -0.02
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) — -0.56 1993 1585 119.7 — — — — — +43 — 41.5% -0.63 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.27
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) — -1.70 1994 1584 111.9 — — — — -177 +77 +41 41.3% -1.04 3–1 (75%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.26
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.07 1995 1491 92.1 — — — — — +74 +59 0.0% -4.33 — — — -0.36
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1650 111.9 — — — — -73 +58 +50 35.7% -1.20 15–14 (52%) 7–9 (44%) 102.0 +2.52

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.