H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Silke Meier H2H: 2-0

Nathalie Herreman holds a 2–0 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Herreman leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Herreman won the 1989 Sydney International round of 64 7-5 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Silke Meier
GER Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Herreman #95 7-5 4-6 6-1 Silke Meier #99 Match data Jan 11, 1989* R64 Sydney International WTA 500 Hard
Nathalie Herreman 6-3 6-4 Silke Meier #241 Match data May 15, 1985* R64 Berlin Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Silke Meier #948 #40 101 1,666 81 141 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Silke Meier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1985 3–3 50.0% #164 1,511 0 0
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1986 10–10 50.0% #85 1,594 0 0
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1987 10–13 43.5% #50 1,591 0 0
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1988 8–16 33.3% #99 1,589 0 0
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1989 7–14 33.3% #148 1,553 0 0
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1990 6–13 31.6% #132 1,529 0 0
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1991 4–9 30.8% #138 1,510 0 0
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1992 10–13 43.5% #80 1,585 0 0
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 1993 6–16 27.3% #151 1,520 0 0
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 1994 5–9 35.7% #113 1,527 0 0
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 1995 10–14 41.7% #91 1,533 0 0
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 1996 2–10 16.7% #205 1,488 0 0
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 1997 0–1 0.0% #234 1,482 0 0
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Silke Meier
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 2 2 4 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7%
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 5 4 9 55.6% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 0 5 5 0.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 3 2 5 60.0% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 2 3 5 40.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1995 2 5 7 28.6% 8 8 16 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 19 33 52 36.5% 47 76 123 38.2% 2 7 9 22.2% 10 24 34 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Silke Meier
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1985 1512 104.5 — — — — — — — 46.2% +0.15 1–0 0–1 — +0.25
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1986 1594 114.1 — — — — +37 -79 — 49.0% +0.08 5–4 (56%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.33
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1987 1591 118.2 — — — — +67 -85 — 44.4% -0.61 6–4 (60%) 2–0 — +0.51
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1988 1590 121.7 — — — — -66 +3 — 36.5% -1.14 3–3 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.89
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1989 1553 105.5 — — — — -80 +44 — 38.5% -0.92 4–6 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 96.0 +1.12
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1990 1529 108.7 — — — — -25 -7 — 30.8% -1.31 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 -0.10
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1991 1511 102.1 — — — — -36 +2 — 31.3% -1.13 4–2 (67%) 0–2 — +0.55
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1992 1585 122.9 — — — — -101 +40 — 45.6% -0.18 5–6 (45%) 1–1 — +1.05
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 1993 1520 105.5 — — — — -11 +5 — 31.4% -1.53 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 100.0 +0.19
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 1994 1528 101.6 — — — — -51 +33 — 34.5% -1.14 1–0 1–0 — +0.23
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 1995 1534 112.4 — — — — -61 +42 — 42.4% -0.52 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 101.7 +1.06
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 1996 1488 107.5 — — — — +7 -8 — 21.4% -2.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.31
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 1997 1482 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -0.14
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 1667 116.0 — — — — -20 +5 — 38.4% -0.83 41–38 (52%) 15–23 (39%) 102.4 +2.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.