H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 0-3

Stephanie Rehe holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Rehe leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1988 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Rehe
USA Age 56 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stephanie Rehe #34 6-3 6-0 Nathalie Herreman #80 Match data Mar 15, 1988* R128 Key Biscayne Category 6 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Stephanie Rehe #24 2-6 6-4 6-2 Nathalie Herreman #57 Match data May 21, 1987* R32 Strasbourg Open WTA 500 Clay
Stephanie Rehe 6-4 7-6 Nathalie Herreman #111 Match data Jan 12, 1984* R32 Hershey WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Stephanie Rehe #156 #10 60 2,005 134 98 57.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Herreman Stephanie Rehe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
11 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1983 0–4 0.0% — 1,472 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1984 1–5 16.7% #182 1,461 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1985 23–12 65.7% #18 1,805 0 2
16 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1986 25–16 61.0% #19 1,823 0 2
17 1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1987 17–8 68.0% #28 1,868 0 3
18 1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1988 43–19 69.4% #14 1,970 0 5
19 1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1990 7–6 53.8% #58 1,972 0 5
21 1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1991 5–12 29.4% #123 1,768 0 5
22 1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1992 9–13 40.9% #74 1,746 0 5
23 1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1993 3–2 60.0% #156 1,759 0 5
24 1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Herreman Stephanie Rehe
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
16 1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1986 15 8 23 65.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
17 1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 10 3 13 76.9% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 33 14 47 70.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8%
19 1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
21 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1991 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1992 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
23 1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1993 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% — 89 52 141 63.1% 12 17 29 41.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 28 21 49 57.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Herreman Stephanie Rehe
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1502 97.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.25 — — — 0.00
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1472 101.2 — — — — — +53 — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–2 — -0.11
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1461 107.5 — — — — +98 — — 33.3% -1.27 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.08
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1805 137.6 — — — — +30 — -204 66.2% +1.22 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 96.2 +1.03
16 1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1986 1824 143.8 — — — — +5 -244 — 59.8% +0.59 9–8 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 99.5 -0.44
17 1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1987 1868 140.6 — — — — +24 -213 — 66.7% +0.83 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 107.0 -1.01
18 1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1988 1971 150.3 — — — — +36 -321 -361 63.4% +0.84 16–4 (80%) 9–7 (56%) 109.5 +1.45
19 1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1990 1972 150.4 — — — — +13 — — 48.4% -0.35 4–1 (80%) 0–2 — -2.64
21 1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1991 1768 119.9 — — — — +127 -164 -189 37.5% -0.45 1–5 (17%) 1–7 (13%) 88.2 +0.02
22 1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1992 1746 139.7 — — — — +45 — — 44.0% -0.42 2–6 (25%) 2–4 (33%) 92.1 -2.65
23 1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1993 1759 118.2 — — — — +25 — — 70.0% +2.00 1–1 — — -0.09
24 1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 — 2005 148.4 — — — — +33 -192 -247 57.2% +0.47 39–35 (53%) 27–34 (44%) 96.6 -1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.