H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Herreman vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 0-3
Stephanie Rehe holds a 3–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Rehe leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stephanie Rehe won the 1988 Key Biscayne first round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 6-3 6-0 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| May 21, 1987* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Stephanie Rehe | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
| Jan 12, 1984* | Hershey | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 6-4 7-6 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Herreman | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |