H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Herreman vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 0-1

Susan Sloane Lundy holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Susan Sloane Lundy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Susan Sloane Lundy won the 1991 San Antonio round of 32 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Herreman
FRA Age 60 Left-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Susan Sloane Lundy
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Susan Sloane Lundy 6-2 6-1 Nathalie Herreman #114 Match data Mar 28, 1991* R32 San Antonio Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Herreman #886 #42 20 1,727 103 154 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Susan Sloane Lundy — — — 1,882 96 94 50.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Nathalie Herreman Susan Sloane Lundy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
1983 4–3 57.1% — 1,547 0 0 1986 9–12 42.9% — 1,595 0 0
1984 8–12 40.0% #125 1,563 0 0 1987 10–14 41.7% — 1,635 0 0
1985 3–6 33.3% #126 1,542 0 0 1988 23–14 62.2% — 1,845 0 1
1986 16–11 59.3% #42 1,717 0 1 1989 20–15 57.1% — 1,755 0 1
1987 11–20 35.5% #91 1,640 0 1 1990 22–16 57.9% — 1,781 0 1
1988 8–12 40.0% #95 1,605 0 1 1991 11–15 42.3% — 1,652 0 1
1989 8–17 32.0% #134 1,568 0 1 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,579 0 1
1990 19–20 48.7% #62 1,683 0 1 — — — — — — —
1991 12–21 36.4% #121 1,618 0 1 — — — — — — —
1992 6–16 27.3% #183 1,556 0 1 — — — — — — —
1993 7–9 43.8% #107 1,623 0 1 — — — — — — —
1994 1–5 16.7% #181 1,584 0 1 — — — — — — —
1995 0–1 0.0% #386 1,580 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Nathalie Herreman Susan Sloane Lundy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1982 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1986 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1984 4 4 8 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1985 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1988 16 9 25 64.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
1986 1 3 4 25.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1987 5 6 11 45.5% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 16 9 25 64.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1988 4 4 8 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1989 6 7 13 46.2% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 11 10 21 52.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1991 4 11 15 26.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 1 4 5 20.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 5 7 12 41.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 41 59 100 41.0% 34 55 89 38.2% 8 16 24 33.3% 20 24 44 45.5% Career 66 62 128 51.6% 21 22 43 48.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Nathalie Herreman Susan Sloane Lundy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1982 1492 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.01 1985 1485 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22
1983 1548 103.2 — — — — — +61 — 50.0% -0.31 2–0 1–0 — +0.65 1986 1596 132.9 — — — — +16 -38 — 43.5% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.3 -0.48
1984 1564 106.0 — — — — +9 +37 — 41.9% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 97.3 +1.16 1987 1636 123.6 — — — — 0 -71 — 39.3% -0.80 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.9 -1.68
1985 1543 100.6 — — — — — -28 — 40.0% -1.30 0–2 — — +0.91 1988 1846 136.9 — — — — -23 -203 — 53.0% +0.20 11–2 (85%) 3–1 (75%) 113.8 -0.25
1986 1718 137.8 — — — — -77 -14 — 62.1% +0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +1.39 1989 1755 137.6 — — — — -4 -18 — 57.9% +0.67 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 94.8 -0.26
1987 1641 121.1 — — — — -12 -7 — 40.8% -0.90 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 95.4 +0.60 1990 1782 135.7 — — — — +21 -73 — 56.5% +0.31 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 99.8 -0.62
1988 1606 116.4 — — — — +37 -63 -63 46.2% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 0–1 — +0.90 1991 1653 118.9 — — — — +54 -8 — 46.3% -0.46 1–5 (17%) — — +0.61
1989 1568 127.3 — — — — +91 -64 — 36.4% -0.73 1–4 (20%) 0–6 (0%) 92.4 -0.56 1992 1580 105.6 — — — — +35 — — 12.5% -2.63 — — — -0.33
1990 1683 140.3 — — — — +41 -156 -113 48.3% -0.24 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 103.4 -1.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1991 1618 118.4 — — — — +27 -109 -32 38.7% -0.83 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 1556 118.1 — — — — +62 -82 — 34.7% -1.06 0–5 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 1623 124.9 — — — — +8 -99 — 41.2% -1.18 2–0 1–0 — -0.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 1585 103.8 — — — — +19 -41 — 21.4% -3.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1995 1581 100.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1727 129.0 — — — — +25 -47 -76 42.9% -0.64 24–42 (36%) 16–19 (46%) 93.0 +0.77 Career 1882 136.6 — — — — +11 -67 — 49.0% -0.10 27–19 (59%) 13–16 (45%) 103.8 -1.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.