H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Herreman vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 0-1
Susan Sloane Lundy holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Herreman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Susan Sloane Lundy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Susan Sloane Lundy won the 1991 San Antonio third round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 60
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 1991* | San Antonio | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-2 6-1 | Nathalie Herreman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Herreman | #886 | #42 | 20 | 1,728 | 103 | 154 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nathalie Herreman | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #126 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #42 | 1,718 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #91 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #134 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #121 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,556 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #181 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #386 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |