H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Andrea Temesvari H2H: 1-0

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Temesvari in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1992 Bayonne round of 16 6-1 6-1.

FRA Age 59 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
HUN Age 60 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Tauziat #12 6-1 6-1 Andrea Temesvari #111 Match data Oct 2, 1992* R16 Bayonne Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Tauziat — #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Andrea Temesvari — #7 109 2,022 185 179 50.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Andrea Temesvari
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 11–6 64.7% — 1,624 0 1
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 1982 18–14 56.2% — 1,771 0 1
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1983 42–15 73.7% — 1,990 0 4
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1984 24–16 60.0% #14 1,889 0 4
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0 1985 18–12 60.0% #16 1,849 0 5
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,850 0 0 1986 11–12 47.8% #43 1,802 0 5
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,876 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% — 1,776 0 5
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1 1989 18–15 54.5% #43 1,750 0 5
24 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,935 0 1 1990 8–19 29.6% #117 1,612 0 5
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1991 6–14 30.0% #159 1,542 0 5
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 1992 11–12 47.8% #70 1,607 0 5
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3 1993 5–20 20.0% #153 1,475 0 5
28 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3 1994 2–7 22.2% #133 1,476 0 5
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4 1995 6–8 42.9% #90 1,485 0 5
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4 1996 4–6 40.0% #181 1,532 0 5
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6 1997 0–1 0.0% #940 1,529 0 5
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Andrea Temesvari
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
16 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 3 3 6 50.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 2 2 4 50.0% 29 5 34 85.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 5 3 8 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4%
19 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 1989 9 7 16 56.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1990 1 7 8 12.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 3 9 12 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
28 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 1995 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6% — 44 57 101 43.6% 89 62 151 58.9% 15 15 30 50.0% 26 43 69 37.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Andrea Temesvari
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1624 130.8 — — — — — — — 60.5% +0.97 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — -0.16
16 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 1982 1772 146.5 — — — — -152 -31 -162 59.2% +0.69 3–6 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -3.02
17 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +23 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17 1983 1990 163.1 — — — — -215 +103 -366 75.4% +2.16 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +1.39
18 1986 1644 133.2 — — — — -36 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.56 1984 1890 136.6 — — — — -79 +109 -174 61.2% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 6–2 (75%) 105.4 +3.45
19 1987 1822 144.0 — — — — -38 -86 -164 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -0.47 1985 1849 136.5 — — — — -48 +129 — 61.5% +0.86 3–4 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 95.7 +1.41
20 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +38 -106 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -0.80 1986 1802 139.5 — — — — -39 +157 — 55.1% +0.29 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) 94.1 -0.74
21 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -63 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.71 1987 1776 105.3 — — — — -39 — — 42.9% -1.29 0–1 — — -0.17
22 1990 1962 157.2 — — — — +21 -108 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -50 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67 1989 1751 135.3 — — — — -31 +153 — 50.0% -0.01 7–3 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 102.1 -0.31
24 1992 1935 154.1 — — — — +33 -15 +3 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30 1990 1612 121.4 — — — — +9 +190 — 34.5% -1.48 2–4 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.1 +0.21
25 1993 1976 158.4 — — — — +43 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82 1991 1542 110.6 — — — — +7 +224 +66 36.4% -1.34 0–4 (0%) 1–4 (20%) 92.0 +0.26
26 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62 1992 1608 122.1 — — — — -5 +81 +64 41.5% -0.70 7–2 (78%) 3–3 (50%) 106.9 +0.26
27 1995 1846 146.3 — — — — -44 +6 +203 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26 1993 1476 111.1 — — — — +32 +134 — 28.8% -1.37 3–5 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 97.7 +0.66
28 1996 1800 152.1 — — — — -33 +40 +315 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06 1994 1477 113.1 — — — — +1 +154 — 27.8% -1.83 1–1 — — -0.25
29 1997 1978 157.1 — — — — -45 -150 +208 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76 1995 1486 104.7 — — — — -22 +124 — 43.8% -0.38 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 100.7 +1.71
30 1998 2025 161.2 — — — — +1 -296 +204 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.52 1996 1532 128.1 — — — — — +113 — 45.5% -0.36 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
31 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.19 1997 1529 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.29
32 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +44 -148 +296 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -189 +393 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2034 158.5 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.24 — 2022 143.4 — — — — -57 +117 -111 52.6% +0.18 42–48 (47%) 33–38 (46%) 97.5 +1.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.