H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Anke Huber H2H: 8-4

Nathalie Tauziat holds an 8–4 lead over Anke Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 7–1 on carpet, while Anke Huber leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Anke Huber won the 2001 Miami Open round of 16 2-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 59 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
8 – 4
12 main-draw meetings
Anke Huber
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anke Huber #15 2-6 6-4 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #12 Match data Mar 25, 2001* R16 Miami Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #8 5-7 6-4 6-3 Anke Huber #19 Match data Nov 6, 1999* SF Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Nathalie Tauziat #10 6-4 6-3 Anke Huber #19 Match data Oct 23, 1999* QF Kremlin Cup Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet
Anke Huber #29 6-3 6-1 Nathalie Tauziat #10 Match data Aug 5, 1999* R32 San Diego Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #9 6-3 6-2 Anke Huber #18 Match data Nov 12, 1998* R32 Philadelphia Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Nathalie Tauziat #9 6-3 6-4 Anke Huber #20 Match data Nov 7, 1998* QF Leipzig Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Nathalie Tauziat #9 6-3 6-3 Anke Huber #19 Match data Oct 31, 1998* QF Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Nathalie Tauziat #21 6-4 6-3 Anke Huber #7 Match data Mar 15, 1997* R16 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Anke Huber #10 3-6 6-1 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #20 Match data Oct 13, 1995* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #30 7-5 6-4 Anke Huber #12 Match data Oct 21, 1994* R16 Brighton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Anke Huber #11 6-1 6-1 Nathalie Tauziat #12 Match data Aug 29, 1992* QF San Diego Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Nathalie Tauziat #17 6-3 7-6 Anke Huber #61 Match data Sep 30, 1990* F Bayonne Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Anke Huber #18 #4 2,721 2,122 398 205 66.0% 0 1 0 4 7 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Anke Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1989 1–1 50.0% #199 1,518 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1990 14–9 60.9% #37 1,708 0 1
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 1991 30–13 69.8% #14 1,959 0 2
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1992 31–16 66.0% #11 1,974 0 2
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1993 41–15 73.2% #10 2,058 0 3
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0 1994 38–16 70.4% #12 2,030 0 6
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,850 0 0 1995 41–15 73.2% #10 2,082 0 7
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,876 0 0 1996 47–16 74.6% #6 2,031 0 10
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1997 34–24 58.6% #13 1,969 0 10
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1 1998 25–18 58.1% #21 1,900 0 10
24 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,935 0 1 1999 32–26 55.2% #16 1,872 0 10
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 2000 29–16 64.4% #19 1,896 0 12
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 2001 35–20 63.6% #18 1,834 0 12
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Anke Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
16 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 15 6 21 71.4% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 10 5 15 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7%
18 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1993 16 7 23 69.6% 16 4 20 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
19 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1994 11 6 17 64.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 19 8 27 70.4% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 12 3 15 80.0%
21 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 21 8 29 72.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 7 1 8 87.5% 11 3 14 78.6%
22 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 1997 17 10 27 63.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 1998 17 10 27 63.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 8 7 15 53.3%
24 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1999 19 13 32 59.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 8 8 16 50.0%
25 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 18 4 22 81.8% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2001 16 9 25 64.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7%
27 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6% — 177 97 274 64.6% 96 45 141 68.1% 31 13 44 70.5% 94 50 144 65.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Anke Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1518 106.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 1–0 — -0.16
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1709 138.4 — — — — +13 -175 — 57.7% +0.90 4–4 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -0.06
16 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 1991 1959 161.8 — — — — -23 -215 -283 67.0% +1.21 6–5 (55%) 4–3 (57%) 104.1 -0.97
17 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +23 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17 1992 1974 163.5 — — — — +13 -112 -289 64.1% +1.16 7–6 (54%) 5–4 (56%) 102.2 -1.03
18 1986 1644 133.2 — — — — -36 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.72 1993 2059 162.3 — — — — -40 -16 -298 66.1% +0.98 13–4 (76%) 7–6 (54%) 107.2 -1.91
19 1987 1822 144.0 — — — — -38 -86 -164 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.34 1994 2031 158.9 — — — — -9 +17 — 64.5% +1.13 12–6 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 102.9 +0.55
20 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +38 -106 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09 1995 2083 168.0 — — — — +12 -34 -316 66.2% +1.32 13–4 (76%) 6–5 (55%) 103.3 -1.78
21 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -63 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.88 1996 2032 160.5 — — — — +31 -42 -104 66.2% +1.29 17–6 (74%) 7–10 (41%) 99.9 +2.81
22 1990 1962 157.2 — — — — +21 -108 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16 1997 1969 163.8 — — — — +40 -72 -51 57.6% +0.58 12–10 (55%) 5–6 (45%) 96.0 -1.85
23 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -50 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67 1998 1901 158.7 — — — — +4 — — 55.0% +0.39 9–7 (56%) 3–7 (30%) 93.2 -0.90
24 1992 1935 154.1 — — — — +33 -15 +3 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30 1999 1872 155.9 — — — — +6 -58 -11 52.6% +0.17 11–10 (52%) 5–5 (50%) 97.6 -1.51
25 1993 1976 158.4 — — — — +43 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82 2000 1896 145.4 — — — — -95 +65 +32 60.0% +0.73 10–7 (59%) 7–7 (50%) 99.9 +0.44
26 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62 2001 1834 151.0 — — — — +13 +62 +140 62.2% +0.78 8–9 (47%) 8–4 (67%) 99.3 +0.22
27 1995 1846 146.3 — — — — -44 +6 +203 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 1800 152.1 — — — — -33 +40 +315 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 1978 157.1 — — — — -45 -150 +208 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 2025 161.2 — — — — +1 -296 +204 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +44 -148 +296 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -189 +393 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2034 158.5 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.41 — 2123 165.4 — — — — +3 -32 -123 61.8% +0.88 123–79 (61%) 66–63 (51%) 100.5 -1.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.