H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nathalie Tauziat vs Annabel Croft H2H: 1-1
Nathalie Tauziat and Annabel Croft are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on grass, while Annabel Croft leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1986 Eastbourne second round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 1986* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Nathalie Tauziat | 7-5 6-1 | Annabel Croft | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1986* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Annabel Croft | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Nathalie Tauziat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | #126 | #3 | 2,562 | 2,033 | 546 | 330 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Annabel Croft | — | — | — | 1,781 | 84 | 92 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Tauziat | Annabel Croft | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–9 | 60.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #66 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–19 | 34.5% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1988 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #26 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–14 | 36.4% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,881 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1990 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #18 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1991 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1992 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,936 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1993 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #18 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1994 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #35 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1995 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #27 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #22 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1997 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1998 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1999 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #7 | 1,987 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2000 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2001 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #13 | 1,863 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |