H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Nathalie Tauziat vs Chris Evert H2H: 0-2
Chris Evert holds a 2–0 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Chris Evert leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chris Evert won the 1989 Key Biscayne third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 71
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 1989* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Chris Evert | 6-3 6-3 | Nathalie Tauziat | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1987 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Chris Evert | 6-3 6-2 | Nathalie Tauziat | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | #126 | #3 | 2,562 | 2,033 | 546 | 330 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Chris Evert | #10 | #1 | 231 | 2,574 | 1,222 | 157 | 88.6% | 18 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 115 | 146 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Tauziat | Chris Evert | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 14–4 | 77.8% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 16 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 28–2 | 93.3% | — | 2,002 | 0 | 11 |
| 17 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 45–8 | 84.9% | — | 2,235 | 0 | 15 |
| 18 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #66 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 86–9 | 90.5% | — | 2,359 | 0 | 27 |
| 19 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 93–7 | 93.0% | — | 2,438 | 2 | 39 |
| 20 | 1988 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #26 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 84–7 | 92.3% | — | 2,508 | 4 | 51 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,881 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 63–5 | 92.6% | — | 2,525 | 6 | 60 |
| 22 | 1990 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #18 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 63–4 | 94.0% | — | 2,553 | 7 | 71 |
| 23 | 1991 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 49–4 | 92.5% | — | 2,568 | 8 | 78 |
| 24 | 1992 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,936 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 81–14 | 85.3% | — | 2,394 | 9 | 85 |
| 25 | 1993 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #18 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 66–9 | 88.0% | — | 2,417 | 11 | 93 |
| 26 | 1994 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #35 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 64–9 | 87.7% | — | 2,423 | 12 | 101 |
| 27 | 1995 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #27 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 66–6 | 91.7% | — | 2,459 | 14 | 110 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #22 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 59–11 | 84.3% | — | 2,353 | 15 | 116 |
| 29 | 1997 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 68–8 | 89.5% | #2 | 2,388 | 16 | 122 |
| 30 | 1998 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 77–8 | 90.6% | #2 | 2,417 | 17 | 131 |
| 31 | 1999 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #7 | 1,987 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 56–6 | 90.3% | #2 | 2,415 | 18 | 137 |
| 32 | 2000 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | 1987 | 68–12 | 85.0% | #3 | 2,331 | 18 | 142 |
| 33 | 2001 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #13 | 1,863 | 0 | 8 | 1988 | 61–12 | 83.6% | #3 | 2,285 | 18 | 146 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 27–10 | 73.0% | #10 | 2,141 | 18 | 146 |