H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Heather Ludloff H2H: 1-1

Nathalie Tauziat and Heather Ludloff are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Heather Ludloff leads 1–0 on grass, while Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heather Ludloff won the 1991 Eastbourne Open round of 32 3-6 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Heather Ludloff
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Heather Ludloff #254 3-6 7-6 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #15 Match data Jun 20, 1991* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Nathalie Tauziat #27 6-4 6-2 Heather Ludloff #95 Match data Sep 3, 1987* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Heather Ludloff #512 #69 11 1,575 48 106 31.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Heather Ludloff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1978 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0 1980 2–5 28.6% — 1,465 0 0
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0 1982 3–4 42.9% — 1,473 0 0
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1983 7–15 31.8% — 1,514 0 0
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1 1984 6–9 40.0% #129 1,545 0 0
24 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1 1985 2–12 14.3% #127 1,488 0 0
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1986 0–1 0.0% #192 1,473 0 0
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 1987 12–16 42.9% #74 1,542 0 0
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3 1988 6–14 30.0% #123 1,504 0 0
28 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3 1989 4–9 30.8% #164 1,468 0 0
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4 1990 2–6 25.0% #219 1,456 0 0
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4 1991 3–5 37.5% #141 1,502 0 0
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6 1992 1–6 14.3% #282 1,472 0 0
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Heather Ludloff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1979 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1980 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1981 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1982 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 1983 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 1984 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1985 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1987 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1989 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 1990 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 1991 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0% 1992 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6% — 20 51 71 28.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 20 33 53 37.7% 7 17 24 29.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Heather Ludloff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +22 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17 1978 1488 88.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.21
18 1986 1643 133.1 — — — — -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.66 1979 1483 102.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.05
19 1987 1821 143.9 — — — — -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.28 1980 1465 105.1 — — — — +53 — — 37.5% -0.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.22
20 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09 1981 1441 97.7 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.27
21 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.99 1982 1473 106.3 — — — — +70 — — 46.7% -0.27 0–1 — — +0.83
22 1990 1962 157.1 — — — — +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16 1983 1515 109.9 — — — — +14 — +43 34.7% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 +0.12
23 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67 1984 1546 102.7 — — — — -41 — +67 41.9% -1.26 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.91
24 1992 1935 154.0 — — — — +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30 1985 1488 104.3 — — — — -35 — +74 22.6% -2.29 0–3 (0%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +0.47
25 1993 1976 158.3 — — — — +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82 1986 1474 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.19
26 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62 1987 1542 110.3 — — — — -48 — +54 43.3% -0.72 6–5 (55%) 2–3 (40%) 104.8 +2.85
27 1995 1845 146.3 — — — — -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26 1988 1504 112.8 — — — — -63 — +65 36.2% -0.83 2–5 (29%) 2–7 (22%) 93.9 +0.36
28 1996 1800 152.0 — — — — -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06 1989 1468 103.4 — — — — +3 — +51 35.5% -1.45 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +1.53
29 1997 1977 157.1 — — — — -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76 1990 1457 97.4 — — — — -10 — +67 26.3% -1.79 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.40
30 1998 2026 161.2 — — — — 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.49 1991 1503 120.4 — — — — -99 — +132 35.0% -1.40 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.37
31 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.18 1992 1473 105.8 — — — — -96 — +134 29.4% -1.47 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — +0.01
32 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2034 158.4 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42 — 1576 110.5 — — — — -27 — +69 35.5% -1.20 19–30 (39%) 22–18 (55%) 102.5 +5.16

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.