H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Jo Durie H2H: 2-1

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 2–1 lead over Jo Durie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 2–0 on carpet, while Jo Durie leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jo Durie won the 1992 Birmingham fourth round 5-7 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jo Durie
GBR Age 65 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 12, 1992* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Jo Durie #45 5-7 6-3 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #14 Match data
Oct 29, 1988* Brighton WTA 250 R16 Carpet Nathalie Tauziat #26 6-3 6-3 Jo Durie #58 Match data
Oct 13, 1988* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Carpet Nathalie Tauziat #25 6-3 6-2 Jo Durie #61 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8
Jo Durie #302 #5 31 2,099 314 264 54.3% 0 0 0 1 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Jo Durie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1976 5–6 45.5% — 1,503 0 0
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 1977 11–7 61.1% — 1,601 0 0
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1978 18–10 64.3% — 1,618 0 1
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1979 15–8 65.2% — 1,713 0 3
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0 1980 21–14 60.0% — 1,734 0 4
20 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0 1981 30–14 68.2% — 1,860 0 7
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0 1982 25–20 55.6% — 1,841 0 7
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1983 47–18 72.3% — 2,093 0 9
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1 1984 16–15 51.6% #24 1,889 0 9
24 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1 1985 17–19 47.2% #26 1,799 0 9
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1986 24–17 58.5% #24 1,842 0 9
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 1987 10–17 37.0% #73 1,741 0 9
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3 1988 19–19 50.0% #60 1,704 0 9
28 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3 1989 8–13 38.1% #117 1,621 0 9
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4 1990 13–13 50.0% #64 1,674 0 9
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4 1991 15–18 45.5% #62 1,717 0 9
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6 1992 13–16 44.8% #59 1,693 0 9
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7 1993 4–12 25.0% #192 1,562 0 9
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8 1994 1–4 20.0% #348 1,554 0 9
34 — — — — — — — 1995 1–3 25.0% #292 1,547 0 9