H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Kristie Boogert H2H: 3-3

Nathalie Tauziat and Kristie Boogert are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Kristie Boogert leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Nathalie Tauziat leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main-draw meetings
Kristie Boogert
NED Age 52 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Tauziat #6 6-3 6-3 Kristie Boogert #71 Match data May 31, 2000* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Kristie Boogert #88 6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #5 Match data Feb 18, 2000* R16 Hanover Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Kristie Boogert #70 7-5 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #29 Match data Mar 19, 1995* R64 Key Biscayne Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kristie Boogert #82 6-0 7-5 Nathalie Tauziat #30 Match data Mar 10, 1995* R16 Delray Beach Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #14 6-1 6-4 Kristie Boogert #93 Match data Sep 2, 1993* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #16 6-3 1-6 6-4 Kristie Boogert #96 Match data May 27, 1993* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Kristie Boogert #564 #29 549 1,770 105 140 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Kristie Boogert
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1991 0–4 0.0% #231 1,469 0 0
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1992 1–4 20.0% #168 1,450 0 0
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0 1993 8–15 34.8% #111 1,495 0 0
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0 1994 17–18 48.6% #53 1,591 0 0
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0 1995 22–16 57.9% #35 1,751 0 0
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1996 13–16 44.8% #55 1,711 0 0
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1 1997 6–10 37.5% #82 1,679 0 0
24 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1 1998 10–15 40.0% #83 1,614 0 0
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1999 9–12 42.9% #94 1,602 0 0
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 2000 12–14 46.2% #66 1,625 0 0
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3 2001 4–11 26.7% #146 1,532 0 0
28 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3 2002 3–4 42.9% #141 1,538 0 0
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4 2003 0–1 0.0% #314 1,531 0 0
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Kristie Boogert
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
18 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1992 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1993 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
21 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 12 8 20 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
22 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 1996 5 5 10 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 1997 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1999 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
26 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2000 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 2001 2 4 6 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2002 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
29 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 2003 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6% — 42 51 93 45.2% 27 45 72 37.5% 19 20 39 48.7% 17 24 41 41.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Kristie Boogert
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +22 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17 1991 1470 105.5 — — — — +28 — — 11.1% -1.89 0–1 — — -0.25
18 1986 1643 133.1 — — — — -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.66 1992 1451 100.6 — — — — — +76 — 27.3% -1.55 0–1 1–1 — +0.26
19 1987 1821 143.9 — — — — -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.28 1993 1495 122.3 — — — — +35 +34 +66 40.7% -0.55 2–6 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.0 +0.78
20 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09 1994 1592 135.8 — — — — +2 -42 +10 51.9% +0.12 3–6 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 99.5 +1.08
21 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.99 1995 1752 145.9 — — — — -20 -150 -154 55.7% +0.67 7–5 (58%) 3–7 (30%) 103.9 -0.03
22 1990 1962 157.1 — — — — +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16 1996 1712 132.3 — — — — -27 -121 -11 47.9% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 1–0 — -0.75
23 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67 1997 1679 128.2 — — — — +33 -110 0 38.9% -0.78 4–4 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.78
24 1992 1935 154.0 — — — — +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30 1998 1614 117.4 — — — — -22 -70 +161 47.4% +0.19 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 94.5 -0.21
25 1993 1976 158.3 — — — — +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82 1999 1603 113.2 — — — — -45 -59 +158 44.7% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 -0.49
26 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62 2000 1625 123.8 — — — — -9 -63 +115 47.5% -0.33 4–5 (44%) 1–3 (25%) 99.6 -0.14
27 1995 1845 146.3 — — — — -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26 2001 1533 108.3 — — — — +60 -52 +187 38.7% -0.71 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — +0.09
28 1996 1800 152.0 — — — — -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06 2002 1538 108.4 — — — — +61 -69 — 46.7% -0.13 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
29 1997 1977 157.1 — — — — -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76 2003 1532 103.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.12
30 1998 2026 161.2 — — — — 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2034 158.4 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42 — 1770 133.9 — — — — +1 -62 +68 46.4% -0.14 32–52 (38%) 20–24 (45%) 96.0 -0.23

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.