H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-1

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1992 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 6-7 6-2 6-1.

FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 1
3 main-draw meetings
PER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Tauziat #13 6-7 6-2 6-1 Laura Arraya #38 Match data Oct 15, 1992* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Laura Arraya #24 6-3 4-6 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #14 Match data Aug 9, 1991* R16 Canadian Open Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Nathalie Tauziat #25 6-1 6-7 7-5 Laura Arraya #18 Match data Feb 16, 1990* R16 Chicago Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Laura Arraya #192 #14 51 1,922 270 204 57.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Laura Arraya
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1981 19–8 70.4% 1,685 0 4
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1982 33–17 66.0% 1,741 0 7
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0 1983 23–23 50.0% 1,712 0 7
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0 1984 29–18 61.7% #34 1,759 0 8
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0 1985 17–21 44.7% #63 1,691 0 8
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1986 23–24 48.9% #33 1,718 0 8
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1 1987 16–14 53.3% #45 1,770 0 8
24 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1989 27–12 69.2% #19 1,882 0 10
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 1990 26–19 57.8% #21 1,821 0 10
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3 1991 28–17 62.2% #24 1,823 0 10
28 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3 1992 20–19 51.3% #45 1,732 0 10
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4 1993 9–12 42.9% #71 1,682 0 10
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Laura Arraya
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1982 10 6 16 62.5% 23 10 33 69.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1983 10 8 18 55.6% 10 11 21 47.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1984 7 7 14 50.0% 19 7 26 73.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1985 9 9 18 50.0% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 1986 3 7 10 30.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2%
23 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 1987 7 5 12 58.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
25 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1989 15 3 18 83.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 2 5 60.0%
26 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1990 13 6 19 68.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
27 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1991 18 12 30 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0%
29 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7%
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0%
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0%
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0%
Career 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6% 105 80 185 56.8% 103 73 176 58.5% 16 14 30 53.3% 28 31 59 47.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Laura Arraya
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1500 112.8 0.0% -4.50 -0.27
17 1985 1540 107.2 +22 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17 1981 1685 129.1 -70 65.6% +0.74 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 -1.24
18 1986 1643 133.1 -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.66 1982 1742 126.9 -61 -27 62.7% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 8–5 (62%) 102.3 +2.71
19 1987 1821 143.9 -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.28 1983 1713 125.7 +8 +30 51.4% -0.24 8–11 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 95.2 +0.84
20 1988 1850 146.7 +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09 1984 1760 130.6 -102 +141 -132 53.8% +0.03 18–5 (78%) 9–4 (69%) 110.1 +0.94
21 1989 1876 150.1 +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.99 1985 1692 124.9 -2 +60 45.1% -0.27 8–7 (53%) 3–2 (60%) 99.8 +1.84
22 1990 1962 157.1 +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16 1986 1718 138.1 -26 +100 51.0% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 100.4 -1.79
23 1991 1987 160.0 +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67 1987 1770 133.4 -31 -11 -184 51.6% +0.05 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.0 -2.60
24 1992 1935 154.0 +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30
25 1993 1976 158.3 +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82 1989 1883 136.8 -8 -146 -254 65.2% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 102.9 +0.41
26 1994 1851 144.9 +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62 1990 1821 141.9 +31 -55 -173 55.4% +0.46 7–4 (64%) 5–8 (38%) 98.6 +0.41
27 1995 1845 146.3 -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26 1991 1823 132.7 +13 -70 -95 56.9% +0.19 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 105.5 +2.96
28 1996 1800 152.0 -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06 1992 1733 139.0 +2 +53 +3 49.4% +0.06 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 +1.62
29 1997 1977 157.1 -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76 1993 1682 125.0 +13 +124 +9 44.0% -0.66 4–4 (50%) 2–0 -0.06
30 1998 2026 161.2 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.49
31 1999 1988 153.0 +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.18
32 2000 1870 151.2 +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24
33 2001 1865 149.8 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32
Career 2034 158.4 +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42 1923 138.4 -10 +27 -133 54.6% +0.19 90–63 (59%) 50–44 (53%) 104.5 +1.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.