H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Nathalie Tauziat holds a 4–0 lead over Linda Wild in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1996 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | 6-1 6-2 | Linda Wild | Match data | Jun 21, 1996* | R32 | Eastbourne Open | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Grass |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 6-1 6-4 | Linda Wild | Match data | Aug 25, 1994* | R32 | Schenectady | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 6-3 6-3 | Linda Wild | Match data | Nov 6, 1993* | QF | Quebec City | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Nathalie Tauziat | 6-1 6-0 | Linda Wild | Match data | Oct 11, 1991* | R16 | Zurich | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Carpet |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | #126 | #3 | 2,562 | 2,033 | 548 | 333 | 62.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,815 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Nathalie Tauziat | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #66 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,821 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,849 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,875 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #18 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 1992 | 39–20 | 66.1% | #14 | 1,934 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,809 | 0 | 5 |
| 1993 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #18 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,625 | 0 | 5 |
| 1994 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #35 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 |
| 1995 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #27 | 1,845 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,540 | 0 | 5 |
| 1996 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #22 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,977 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 2,025 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #7 | 1,988 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #10 | 1,869 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #13 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Nathalie Tauziat | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1984 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1990 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1987 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1991 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 47.1% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 1988 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1992 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 1989 | 17 | 9 | 26 | 65.4% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1993 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% |
| 1990 | 18 | 7 | 25 | 72.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 1994 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 1991 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 1995 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% |
| 1992 | 14 | 8 | 22 | 63.6% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1996 | 15 | 10 | 25 | 60.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1993 | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1997 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1999 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 11 | 2 | 13 | 84.6% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 15 | 9 | 24 | 62.5% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 14 | 6 | 20 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 14 | 11 | 25 | 56.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 13 | 7 | 20 | 65.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 19 | 11 | 30 | 63.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 212 | 137 | 349 | 60.7% | 107 | 75 | 182 | 58.8% | 109 | 43 | 152 | 71.7% | 120 | 78 | 198 | 60.6% | Career | 70 | 79 | 149 | 47.0% | 19 | 30 | 49 | 38.8% | 19 | 19 | 38 | 50.0% | 27 | 18 | 45 | 60.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Nathalie Tauziat | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1984 | 1500 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | -0.27 | 1972 | 1493 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.09 |
| 1985 | 1540 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 46.7% | 0.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | 101.7 | +0.17 | 1989 | 1457 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 17.6% | -2.06 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.09 |
| 1986 | 1643 | 133.1 | — | — | — | — | -35 | -75 | -21 | 46.4% | -0.09 | 3–8 (27%) | 3–3 (50%) | 98.0 | -0.66 | 1990 | 1555 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | +1 | -3 | — | 43.2% | -0.52 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.4 | -0.32 |
| 1987 | 1821 | 143.9 | — | — | — | — | -37 | -85 | -163 | 55.4% | +0.15 | 14–5 (74%) | 5–2 (71%) | 112.3 | -1.28 | 1991 | 1721 | 134.6 | — | — | — | — | -71 | -49 | -115 | 50.0% | -0.26 | 8–4 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 107.4 | -0.67 |
| 1988 | 1850 | 146.7 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -107 | -227 | 56.3% | +0.59 | 12–5 (71%) | 6–4 (60%) | 105.7 | -1.09 | 1992 | 1733 | 139.7 | — | — | — | — | -89 | -75 | +45 | 47.8% | -0.05 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–2 (67%) | 103.9 | -1.52 |
| 1989 | 1876 | 150.1 | — | — | — | — | +23 | -64 | -230 | 57.9% | +0.68 | 10–4 (71%) | 9–5 (64%) | 106.8 | -2.99 | 1993 | 1765 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -174 | -41 | 56.4% | +0.47 | 7–5 (58%) | 3–4 (43%) | 99.5 | +0.50 |
| 1990 | 1962 | 157.1 | — | — | — | — | +20 | -109 | -164 | 63.2% | +0.99 | 16–4 (80%) | 4–8 (33%) | 104.4 | -0.16 | 1994 | 1741 | 132.8 | — | — | — | — | -38 | -164 | +80 | 51.6% | -0.05 | 8–9 (47%) | 6–4 (60%) | 98.6 | -1.90 |
| 1991 | 1987 | 160.0 | — | — | — | — | +41 | -51 | -179 | 61.7% | +0.77 | 11–5 (69%) | 8–8 (50%) | 102.2 | -2.67 | 1995 | 1758 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +19 | -201 | +14 | 58.0% | +0.57 | 3–6 (33%) | 4–4 (50%) | 96.1 | +1.45 |
| 1992 | 1935 | 154.0 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -15 | +4 | 61.8% | +0.83 | 12–6 (67%) | 7–5 (58%) | 102.0 | -0.30 | 1996 | 1810 | 144.4 | — | — | — | — | +25 | -227 | -22 | 55.2% | +0.55 | 7–6 (54%) | 6–8 (43%) | 101.6 | +0.67 |
| 1993 | 1976 | 158.3 | — | — | — | — | +42 | -98 | +43 | 62.9% | +0.80 | 13–5 (72%) | 6–6 (50%) | 102.3 | +0.82 | 1997 | 1625 | 106.2 | — | — | — | — | +96 | -90 | +72 | 25.6% | -2.15 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–3 (40%) | 95.7 | +0.19 |
| 1994 | 1851 | 144.9 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -21 | +122 | 56.9% | +0.60 | 8–8 (50%) | 5–6 (45%) | 93.9 | +0.62 | 1999 | 1567 | 91.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.38 |
| 1995 | 1845 | 146.3 | — | — | — | — | -43 | +7 | +204 | 57.1% | +0.38 | 7–6 (54%) | 3–4 (43%) | 98.3 | -1.26 | 2000 | 1541 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.42 |
| 1996 | 1800 | 152.0 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +40 | +313 | 58.3% | +0.73 | 6–10 (38%) | 7–1 (88%) | 97.2 | -1.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 1977 | 157.1 | — | — | — | — | -43 | -149 | +209 | 60.7% | +0.51 | 15–8 (65%) | 12–7 (63%) | 105.5 | -0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 2026 | 161.2 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -297 | +207 | 58.7% | +0.74 | 16–6 (73%) | 7–7 (50%) | 101.5 | +0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 1988 | 153.0 | — | — | — | — | +7 | -271 | +186 | 58.7% | +0.52 | 13–12 (52%) | 5–7 (42%) | 95.8 | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1870 | 151.2 | — | — | — | — | +43 | -148 | +295 | 56.9% | +0.40 | 12–10 (55%) | 9–3 (75%) | 99.7 | +4.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1865 | 149.8 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -190 | +392 | 57.1% | +0.37 | 15–10 (60%) | 14–4 (78%) | 105.2 | +2.32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 2034 | 158.4 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -87 | +99 | 58.5% | +0.58 | 185–113 (62%) | 111–82 (58%) | 106.0 | -0.42 | Career | 1816 | 137.3 | — | — | — | — | -7 | -98 | +18 | 48.5% | -0.14 | 43–42 (51%) | 31–29 (52%) | 102.2 | -0.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 21 | 21 | Nov 14, 1998 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 2 | 13 | 15 | Aug 11, 2001 | H2H |
| Zina Garrison | 3 | 10 | 13 | Nov 14, 1996 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 8 | 4 | 12 | Mar 25, 2001 | H2H |
| Natasha Zvereva | 6 | 6 | 12 | Jun 20, 1999 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | 3 | 2 | 5 | Nov 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 1, 1996 | H2H |
| Rachel Mcquillan | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 28, 1995 | H2H |
| Tami Whitlinger Jones | 5 | 0 | 5 | Feb 17, 1994 | H2H |
| Nicole Bradtke | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 20, 1993 | H2H |