H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 3-4

Lori Mcneil holds a 4–3 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 3–1 on grass, while Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1995 Canadian Open third round 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 17, 1995* Canadian Open WTA 1000 R32 Hard Nathalie Tauziat #17 7-5 6-3 Lori Mcneil #53 Match data
Jun 24, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Nathalie Tauziat #31 6-4 6-2 Lori Mcneil #23 Match data
Feb 3, 1994* Tokyo Pan Pacific WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Nathalie Tauziat #19 6-2 7-5 Lori Mcneil #25 Match data
Jun 19, 1993* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Lori Mcneil #19 6-1 7-5 Nathalie Tauziat #17 Match data
Jun 12, 1993* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Lori Mcneil #23 6-4 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #17 Match data
Jun 20, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Lori Mcneil #25 7-6 6-7 7-5 Nathalie Tauziat #14 Match data
May 31, 1989* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Lori Mcneil #17 6-4 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11