H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Meredith Mcgrath H2H: 3-2

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 3–2 lead over Meredith Mcgrath in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Meredith Mcgrath leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Meredith Mcgrath won the 1996 Birmingham final 2-6 6-4 6-4.

FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 55

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 16, 1996* Birmingham WTA 250 F Grass Meredith Mcgrath #53 2-6 6-4 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #22 Match data
Feb 17, 1995* Paris WTA 500 R32 Hard Nathalie Tauziat #29 6-4 6-4 Meredith Mcgrath #37 Match data
Oct 13, 1994* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Nathalie Tauziat #30 7-5 6-2 Meredith Mcgrath #33 Match data
Jun 17, 1994* Eastbourne WTA 250 R16 Grass Meredith Mcgrath #39 6-4 3-6 6-3 Nathalie Tauziat #21 Match data
Feb 8, 1990* Wichita WTA 250 R32 Hard Nathalie Tauziat #25 6-3 4-6 7-5 Meredith Mcgrath #94 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8
Meredith Mcgrath #315 #18 898 1,927 90 84 51.7% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Meredith Mcgrath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1988 0–1 0.0% #400 1,497 0 0
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1989 6–10 37.5% #93 1,517 0 0
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0 1990 15–12 55.6% #28 1,708 0 0
20 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0 1991 4–6 40.0% #164 1,679 0 0
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #780 1,657 0 0
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1993 12–12 50.0% #66 1,707 0 0
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1 1994 22–16 57.9% #39 1,767 0 2
24 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1 1995 11–15 42.3% #62 1,742 0 2
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1996 19–9 67.9% #26 1,917 0 3
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3 1998 1–2 33.3% #318 1,874 0 3
28 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8