H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Miho Saeki H2H: 1-0

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 1–0 lead over Miho Saeki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1999 Indian Wells Open round of 32 6-1 6-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Miho Saeki
JPN Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Tauziat #10 6-1 6-7 6-3 Miho Saeki #107 Match data Mar 11, 1999* R32 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Miho Saeki #884 #56 461 1,579 26 57 31.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Miho Saeki
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #234 1,480 0 0
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0 1996 3–7 30.0% #120 1,487 0 0
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0 1997 5–12 29.4% #76 1,488 0 0
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1998 9–15 37.5% #89 1,512 0 0
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1 1999 6–11 35.3% #119 1,525 0 0
24 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 2001 0–2 0.0% #179 1,500 0 0
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 2002 2–4 33.3% #201 1,499 0 0
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3 2003 0–2 0.0% #256 1,473 0 0
28 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3 2004 1–1 50.0% #260 1,489 0 0
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4 2005 0–1 0.0% #210 1,472 0 0
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Miho Saeki
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 1998 5 10 15 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 1999 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2002 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 2005 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6% — 21 41 62 33.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 2 5 7 28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Miho Saeki
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +22 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1986 1643 133.1 — — — — -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1987 1821 143.9 — — — — -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.28 1995 1480 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.09
20 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09 1996 1487 103.2 — — — — +21 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 2–0 — +0.13
21 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.99 1997 1489 122.4 — — — — +41 — — 38.1% -0.95 2–6 (25%) 4–4 (50%) 98.6 +0.43
22 1990 1962 157.1 — — — — +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16 1998 1513 115.8 — — — — +31 +52 — 39.3% -0.88 3–5 (38%) 3–4 (43%) 98.6 +0.99
23 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67 1999 1525 118.8 — — — — +30 — — 42.5% -0.47 1–5 (17%) 3–1 (75%) 99.7 +0.08
24 1992 1935 154.0 — — — — +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 1976 158.3 — — — — +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82 2001 1500 98.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.22
26 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62 2002 1500 91.2 — — — — +3 — — 30.8% -1.39 1–0 0–3 (0%) — -0.20
27 1995 1845 146.3 — — — — -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26 2003 1474 98.3 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 — — -0.02
28 1996 1800 152.0 — — — — -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06 2004 1489 102.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.17
29 1997 1977 157.1 — — — — -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76 2005 1472 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.25
30 1998 2026 161.2 — — — — 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2034 158.4 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42 — 1580 114.0 — — — — +29 +52 — 36.4% -1.06 9–20 (31%) 13–13 (50%) 95.9 +1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.