H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Nathalie Tauziat vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 1-0
Nathalie Tauziat holds a 1–0 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1987 Brighton third round 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 69
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 1987* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nathalie Tauziat | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Mima Jausovec | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nathalie Tauziat | #126 | #3 | 2,562 | 2,033 | 546 | 330 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
| Mima Jausovec | #400 | #23 | 2 | 2,088 | 339 | 246 | 57.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Nathalie Tauziat | Mima Jausovec | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 2–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 18–13 | 58.1% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #66 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 33–16 | 67.3% | — | 1,996 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1988 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #26 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 2,008 | 1 | 5 |
| 21 | 1989 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,881 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,922 | 1 | 6 |
| 22 | 1990 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #18 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 32–28 | 53.3% | — | 1,866 | 1 | 6 |
| 23 | 1991 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 34–22 | 60.7% | — | 1,941 | 1 | 6 |
| 24 | 1992 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,936 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 57–28 | 67.1% | — | 2,010 | 1 | 6 |
| 25 | 1993 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #18 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 36–24 | 60.0% | — | 1,861 | 1 | 7 |
| 26 | 1994 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #35 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,873 | 1 | 7 |
| 27 | 1995 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #27 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #87 | 1,747 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #22 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,695 | 1 | 7 |
| 29 | 1997 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #184 | 1,673 | 1 | 7 |
| 30 | 1998 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #233 | 1,656 | 1 | 7 |
| 31 | 1999 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #7 | 1,987 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #362 | 1,641 | 1 | 7 |
| 32 | 2000 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2001 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #13 | 1,863 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |