H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 3-1

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 3–1 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 3–0 on grass, while Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 2001 Birmingham final 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 53 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2001* Birmingham WTA 250 F Grass Nathalie Tauziat #12 6-3 7-5 Miriam Oremans #89 Match data
Feb 19, 1999* Hanover WTA 250 R16 Carpet Miriam Oremans #56 6-4 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #10 Match data
Jun 15, 1996* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Nathalie Tauziat #22 6-2 6-3 Miriam Oremans #42 Match data
Jun 10, 1994* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Nathalie Tauziat #22 6-7 7-6 6-3 Miriam Oremans #40 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 546 330 62.3% 0 1 0 1 6 8
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,809 161 181 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,471 0 0
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,845 0 0 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,532 0 0
20 1988 30–19 61.2% #26 1,856 0 0 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,747 0 0
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,881 0 0 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,769 0 0
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,970 0 1 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 1992 38–19 66.7% #14 1,936 0 1 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,774 0 0
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,729 0 0
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,628 0 0
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,846 0 3 2000 16–12 57.1% #64 1,701 0 0
28 1996 30–21 58.8% #22 1,806 0 3 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,686 0 0
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,976 0 4 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,611 0 0
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,024 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,987 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,868 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,863 0 8 — — — — — — —