H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Petra Huber H2H: 2-0

Nathalie Tauziat holds a 2–0 lead over Petra Huber in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1989 Hamburg Open round of 64 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 58 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Petra Huber
AUT Age 60

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Tauziat #38 6-3 6-2 Petra Huber #236 Match data May 3, 1989* R64 Hamburg Open WTA 250 Clay
Nathalie Tauziat #134 6-3 6-3 Petra Huber Match data Oct 31, 1985* R32 Zurich WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Tauziat #126 #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Petra Huber #458 #37 13 1,737 58 79 42.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Petra Huber
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 1982 4–2 66.7% — 1,563 0 1
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1983 4–6 40.0% — 1,596 0 1
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1984 12–14 46.2% #48 1,652 0 1
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0 1985 10–15 40.0% #53 1,631 0 1
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,849 0 0 1986 14–14 50.0% #63 1,625 0 2
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,875 0 0 1987 11–14 44.0% #84 1,652 0 2
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1988 3–13 18.8% #178 1,519 0 2
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1 1989 0–1 0.0% #444 1,514 0 2
24 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,934 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Petra Huber
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1985 1 6 7 14.3% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 10 10 20 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 1988 0 4 4 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6% — 10 27 37 27.0% 45 41 86 52.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 8 11 27.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Petra Huber
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 1982 1564 115.4 — — — — — +61 — 60.0% +1.70 — 0–1 — +0.15
17 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +22 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17 1983 1597 121.2 — — — — -52 +132 — 45.8% -0.54 1–3 (25%) — — +0.57
18 1986 1643 133.1 — — — — -35 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.66 1984 1653 126.1 — — — — -47 +62 — 46.8% +0.15 5–5 (50%) 1–1 — +1.10
19 1987 1821 143.9 — — — — -37 -85 -163 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -1.28 1985 1631 127.0 — — — — -93 +117 — 40.4% -0.21 4–3 (57%) 1–4 (20%) 100.6 +0.22
20 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +37 -107 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -1.09 1986 1626 120.8 — — — — -93 +110 — 50.8% -0.03 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 99.5 +1.87
21 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -64 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.99 1987 1652 141.2 — — — — -127 +79 — 47.4% -0.19 2–5 (29%) 4–2 (67%) 97.3 -1.91
22 1990 1962 157.1 — — — — +20 -109 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16 1988 1520 111.0 — — — — -64 +79 — 29.7% -1.40 0–5 (0%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.13
23 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -51 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67 1989 1515 100.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.23
24 1992 1935 154.0 — — — — +33 -15 +4 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1993 1976 158.3 — — — — +42 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1995 1845 146.3 — — — — -43 +7 +204 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1996 1800 152.0 — — — — -33 +40 +313 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1997 1977 157.1 — — — — -43 -149 +209 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1998 2026 161.2 — — — — 0 -297 +207 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +43 -148 +295 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -190 +392 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2034 158.4 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.42 — 1737 132.3 — — — — -76 +93 — 44.6% -0.22 16–26 (38%) 10–12 (45%) 94.8 +1.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.