H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Nathalie Tauziat vs Sylvia Hanika H2H: 0-1

Sylvia Hanika holds a 1–0 lead over Nathalie Tauziat in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sylvia Hanika leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1986 Hilversum quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Nathalie Tauziat
FRA Age 59 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sylvia Hanika
GER Age 66 Left-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sylvia Hanika #62 6-1 6-4 Nathalie Tauziat #72 Match data Oct 4, 1986* QF Hilversum WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Nathalie Tauziat — #3 2,562 2,033 548 333 62.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8
Sylvia Hanika — #5 48 2,137 415 239 63.5% 0 0 1 0 8 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Sylvia Hanika
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1984 0–1 0.0% #296 1,499 0 0 1976 2–1 66.7% — 1,533 0 0
17 1985 3–3 50.0% #112 1,539 0 0 1977 5–3 62.5% — 1,583 0 0
18 1986 12–17 41.4% #66 1,643 0 0 1978 27–14 65.9% — 1,817 0 1
19 1987 32–20 61.5% #25 1,821 0 0 1979 26–16 61.9% — 1,950 0 3
20 1988 31–20 60.8% #26 1,850 0 0 1980 40–22 64.5% — 2,003 0 4
21 1989 32–19 62.7% #25 1,876 0 0 1981 61–23 72.6% #6 2,085 0 6
22 1990 46–20 69.7% #18 1,962 0 1 1982 41–23 64.1% #10 1,946 0 7
23 1991 38–20 65.5% #13 1,987 0 1 1983 47–22 68.1% #5 1,970 0 7
24 1992 39–20 66.1% #14 1,935 0 1 1984 29–20 59.2% #17 1,880 0 8
25 1993 41–18 69.5% #18 1,975 0 2 1985 22–16 57.9% — 1,868 0 8
26 1994 29–21 58.0% #35 1,850 0 2 1986 14–14 50.0% #50 1,803 0 9
27 1995 27–19 58.7% #27 1,845 0 3 1987 32–19 62.7% #14 1,919 0 9
28 1996 30–22 57.7% #22 1,799 0 3 1988 44–22 66.7% #17 1,919 0 9
29 1997 40–21 65.6% #11 1,977 0 4 1989 18–14 56.2% #41 1,806 0 9
30 1998 41–23 64.1% #10 2,025 0 4 1990 7–10 41.2% #123 1,702 0 9
31 1999 37–23 61.7% #7 1,988 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2000 36–25 59.0% #10 1,869 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2001 34–21 61.8% #13 1,864 0 8 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Sylvia Hanika
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1977 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0%
18 1986 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 5 15 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0%
19 1987 12 8 20 60.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 1979 5 5 10 50.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
20 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 14 10 24 58.3%
21 1989 17 9 26 65.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 15 6 21 71.4% 19 5 24 79.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 26 10 36 72.2%
22 1990 18 7 25 72.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 25 10 35 71.4%
23 1991 14 8 22 63.6% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 5 15 66.7% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 28 12 40 70.0%
24 1992 14 8 22 63.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1984 10 6 16 62.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 4 11 63.6%
25 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 1985 11 6 17 64.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1994 10 9 19 52.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0%
27 1995 9 9 18 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 11 4 15 73.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
28 1996 11 9 20 55.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1988 16 8 24 66.7% 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
29 1997 12 8 20 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 2 13 84.6% 11 7 18 61.1% 1989 8 6 14 57.1% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
30 1998 15 9 24 62.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 9 2 11 81.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 1990 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1999 7 9 16 43.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 11 3 14 78.6% 14 6 20 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 19 11 30 63.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 212 137 349 60.7% 107 75 182 58.8% 109 43 152 71.7% 120 78 198 60.6% — 99 60 159 62.3% 129 64 193 66.8% 38 32 70 54.3% 144 80 224 64.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Nathalie Tauziat Sylvia Hanika
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1984 1500 112.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.27 1976 1533 101.8 — — — — +88 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 1–1 — +0.64
17 1985 1540 107.2 — — — — — +23 — 46.7% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.7 +0.17 1977 1584 118.4 — — — — +75 -25 — 55.6% +1.28 2–0 1–1 — +1.84
18 1986 1644 133.2 — — — — -36 -75 -21 46.4% -0.09 3–8 (27%) 3–3 (50%) 98.0 -0.56 1978 1817 145.6 — — — — -62 -183 -96 62.6% +1.14 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.8 +0.65
19 1987 1822 144.0 — — — — -38 -86 -164 55.4% +0.15 14–5 (74%) 5–2 (71%) 112.3 -0.47 1979 1951 158.3 — — — — -90 -104 -188 57.9% +0.65 8–5 (62%) 4–5 (44%) 106.6 -2.46
20 1988 1850 146.7 — — — — +38 -106 -227 56.3% +0.59 12–5 (71%) 6–4 (60%) 105.7 -0.80 1980 2003 159.4 — — — — +15 -68 -218 61.3% +0.93 11–4 (73%) 4–5 (44%) 105.0 -6.31
21 1989 1876 150.1 — — — — +23 -63 -230 57.9% +0.68 10–4 (71%) 9–5 (64%) 106.8 -2.71 1981 2085 166.5 — — — — -7 +24 — 68.4% +1.72 12–7 (63%) 1–5 (17%) 99.1 -8.73
22 1990 1962 157.2 — — — — +21 -108 -164 63.2% +0.99 16–4 (80%) 4–8 (33%) 104.4 -0.16 1982 1946 157.2 — — — — +137 +62 -221 64.4% +1.18 8–7 (53%) 4–8 (33%) 94.3 -1.96
23 1991 1987 160.0 — — — — +41 -50 -179 61.7% +0.77 11–5 (69%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 -2.67 1983 1971 163.0 — — — — +82 +36 -191 63.4% +1.12 17–8 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 -1.30
24 1992 1935 154.1 — — — — +33 -15 +3 61.8% +0.83 12–6 (67%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -0.30 1984 1880 145.2 — — — — +103 +50 -140 58.5% +0.42 10–4 (71%) 5–0 (100%) 105.7 -0.38
25 1993 1976 158.4 — — — — +43 -98 +43 62.9% +0.80 13–5 (72%) 6–6 (50%) 102.3 +0.82 1985 1868 147.5 — — — — +28 +92 — 59.5% +0.67 4–3 (57%) 5–3 (63%) 99.6 -2.52
26 1994 1851 144.9 — — — — +28 -21 +122 56.9% +0.60 8–8 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 93.9 +0.62 1986 1804 136.3 — — — — +9 +158 -98 51.6% -0.02 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 98.6 -0.59
27 1995 1846 146.3 — — — — -44 +6 +203 57.1% +0.38 7–6 (54%) 3–4 (43%) 98.3 -1.26 1987 1920 155.2 — — — — +18 +3 -153 62.2% +0.91 7–10 (41%) 3–5 (38%) 96.5 -1.48
28 1996 1800 152.1 — — — — -33 +40 +315 58.3% +0.73 6–10 (38%) 7–1 (88%) 97.2 -1.06 1988 1919 153.4 — — — — +53 +15 -188 61.6% +0.85 14–5 (74%) 5–4 (56%) 102.8 -1.02
29 1997 1978 157.1 — — — — -45 -150 +208 60.7% +0.51 15–8 (65%) 12–7 (63%) 105.5 -0.76 1989 1806 132.5 — — — — +29 +122 — 52.9% +0.26 9–1 (90%) 4–4 (50%) 103.4 +0.41
30 1998 2025 161.2 — — — — +1 -296 +204 58.7% +0.74 16–6 (73%) 7–7 (50%) 101.5 +0.52 1990 1703 116.6 — — — — +42 +152 — 50.0% -0.35 2–6 (25%) — — +0.81
31 1999 1988 153.0 — — — — +7 -271 +186 58.7% +0.52 13–12 (52%) 5–7 (42%) 95.8 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2000 1870 151.2 — — — — +44 -148 +296 56.9% +0.40 12–10 (55%) 9–3 (75%) 99.7 +4.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2001 1865 149.8 — — — — 0 -189 +393 57.1% +0.37 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 105.2 +2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2034 158.5 — — — — +9 -87 +99 58.5% +0.58 185–113 (62%) 111–82 (58%) 106.0 -0.24 — 2138 160.0 — — — — +39 +22 -162 61.2% +0.90 114–67 (63%) 50–53 (49%) 100.0 -3.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.